[Decky]

http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/get-h ... 1073895111

To receive Hurricane Harvey relief grants, residents and businesses from a small Texas city must pledge to not boycott Israel, according to the city of Dickinson’s application.

The application, found on Dickinson’s website, includes a clause stating that any individual or business asking for financial assistance “does not boycott Israel” and “will not boycott Israel” if approved.

Dickinson Mayor Julie Masters, whose house was flooded by Harvey, told Middle East Eye that the clause was added because of a state law that forbids contractors to boycott Israel.

The law is known as the Anti-Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions law (Anti-BDS). Passed and signed into law in May, it was touted by Texas Governor Greg Abbott: "I am proud to have commemorated Israel’s Independence Day by signing into law Anti-BDS legislation in Texas," Abbott said in a news release.

“As Israel's number one trading partner in the United States, Texas is proud to reaffirm its support for the people of Israel and we will continue to build on our historic partnership. Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies, and we will not tolerate such actions against an important ally,” he added.

Masters said Dickinson's attorney and the city council are discussing the possibility of removing the clause. The town does not have a strong financial connection to Israel, nor does it have many Israeli immigrants.

Houston-based civil rights attorney Randall Kallinen told Middle East Eye that the clause is a violation of freedom of speech.

“It would violate the first amendment to the Constitution to require someone to abstain from a boycott of a country, because boycotts are treated the same as speech by the law," Kallinen said.

"The Supreme Court of the United States has already decided that boycotts are a form of free speech. You cannot premise disaster relief acceptance upon agreeing to not boycott someone,” he said.

He also added that “there is no indication” the anti-BDS law applies to individuals.

Rights groups, including the ACLU, agree that the clause violates free speech.

“The First Amendment protects Americans’ right to boycott, and the government cannot condition hurricane relief or any other public benefit on a commitment to refrain from protected political expression,” ACLU of Texas Legal Director Andre Segura said in a news release.

“Dickinson’s requirement is an egregious violation of the First Amendment, reminiscent of McCarthy-era loyalty oaths requiring Americans to disavow membership in the Communist party and other forms of ‘subversive’ activity,” Segura added.

Surrounding cities hit by Harvey have not added similar stipulations that Middle East Eye could find, and Kallinen said he is unaware of any other municipalities requiring a like-minded clause.

Hurricane Harvey wrecked the Texas Gulf shore when it landed south of Houston, then moved slowly up the coast, dumping historic amounts of rainfall and flooding thousands of homes and businesses. Two university professors estimated that the total damage in the areas affected may reach almost $200bn.

According to police reports, 10,000 residents from Dickinson reported damages to more than 7,000 homes and 88 businesses.

How interesting... And how convienient for a certain few. Cui bono? It is something that I ask myself after ever disaster and there is only ever one answer. Stay safe out there Pofo. Those of us who never buy Israeli peppers and oranges seem to be more at risk from natrual phenomena than those who are still plugged into the matrix. Hate to say I told you so...

[Beren]

And Decky returns...

How much did you work on that?

[Decky]

Returns?

[anasawad]

yes

[vinnydell]

How does a banker cause a Hurricane ?

[Decky]

How does a banker cause a Hurricane ?

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/roth ... ng-empire/

Why would the Rothschilds be so interested in owning the largest and most recognized weather modeling organization out there? Why would E.L. Rothschild LLC wish to have the controlling interest in the world’s leading provider of interactive weather graphics and data services for television, web, and mobil? Because when you are involved in climate decimating geoengineering programs, you must also control the “forecast” models to cover your tracks.

The scope and scale of the global spraying of our skies can hardly be comprehended. SAG (stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) and SRM (solar radiation management), the massive web of supporting structures for these programs is mind bending. What is even more difficult to understand is how all of this happens in plain sight, and almost none seem to connect the dots.

Defense contractor “Raytheon” does all the “forecast” modeling for the National Weather Service and NOAA. Lockheed Martin does the modeling for the FAA. Since both of these private defense contractors are up to their necks in weather modification patents and programs, the “forecasts” are more or less the “scheduled” weather. Now, with the Rothschild’s acquisition of the dominant private modeling organization, the control of weather “modeling” seems complete. This control of “forecasts” and “graphics” provides for the constant visual conditioning that makes the population more likely to accept the constant spraying and manipulation of our weather as “normal”. When the nightly weather “forecast animation” matches what the public sees in the sky, right down to the upper level “haze” or “overcast” from the constant spraying, all seems to correlate, so nothing more is questioned. When the “forecasters” predict a hurricane will make an unprecedented 90 degree turn, and it does, nothing seems wrong. When they say there will be “heavy wet snow” at 40+ degrees, and there is, all appears OK. The global elites have, it seems, “covered all the bases”.