1- The dramatic increase of divorce undermined the institution of the family.
This is more likely to be a symptom of the social chaos rather than a cause of social breakdown.
2- The imposition of higher taxes undermined the economic stability and vitality of the Empire. Taxes were raised to pay for deficit government spending, to pay for food for all in society and to pay for government-sponsored activities of diversion, such as circuses and sports. Interestingly, as the time of the final collapse drew closer, greater emphasis was placed on sports, to divert the attention of the public from the distressing news of massive trouble within the Empire.
The 'bread and circuses' (and the high taxes required to pay for them and for the bureaucracy) were necessary to buy off the proletariat, who were chronically unemployed due to the institution of slavery. It was a way of purchasing social stability relatively cheaply, and it worked suceessfully for half a millennium. It was not a direct cause of the downfall.
3- The drive for personal pleasure had become very intense, even to the point of obsession. Gibbons noted that, at the very end, sports had become more exciting and brutal.
True, but this was, again, a symptom rather than a cause.
4- People lost their faith, both religiously and in their government. Paganism gave way to Christianity and the efficient Roman Government gave way to chaos and disintegration.
This is self-contradictory. If people were losing their faith, then where did Christianity come from? Far from losing their faith, the Roman citizens were gaining it. And Christianity did not accelerate the disintegration of the Roman Empire, it actually delayed it for several centuries. Gibbon had a bee in his bonnet about Christianity, due to some unfortunately personal experiences, and he tried to pin the blame for the decline of Rome on the growth of Christianity. It's total nonsense of course - Christianity was an agent of social cohesion rather than disintegration. Why else do you think Constantine made it the official state religion?
5- Hidden conspirators were working within the government to secretly destroy it. They worked quietly, invisibly and deceitfully; during the entire time they were secretly dismantling the government of the Roman Empire, they publicly proclaimed their unswerving support of it.
Total nonsense. Tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory rubbish. Who were these 'hidden conspirators'? The Freemasons? Teh Jews? What evidence does this guy present? I've actually read Gibbon's 'Decline and Fall', and I don't recall him mentioning any 'hidden conspirators'.
Recognize any of the above 5 points occurring in Western societies today?
Yes. Not surprising, really, since the OP has selected points which apply to modern Western society rather than ancient Rome (except for item 5, which applies to nothing except the OP's own fevered imagination).
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." - Marx (Groucho)