Victoribus Spolia wrote:Are knife crimes in London disproportionately committed by ethnic minorities in comparison to the ethnic British population of the United Kingdom...yes or no?
You have gone from this is down to" Islamic militants", to "Muslims" to "ethnic minorities" in general.
Well, religion isn't the same as race, but setting aside that, I really don't understand this sentence because of its grammatical structure. So are you saying i'm a racist because I argued that by simple statistical analysis a policy of profiling based of proportion to criminal contribution would be rational?
You are arguing that nationals of different ethnic/religious groups should have different rights than others. This is the textbook definition of racism and it is quite hilarious that it would bother you. If it bothers you and makes you feel ashamed of yourself perhaps you should not argue such things.
Well, I don't think its only Islamic immigrants, that would be unfair to the black community in London which also commits a disproportionate amount of crime to their numbers as % of all Brits. Likewise, I never specifically said that it was returning ISIS fighters who were the ones doing all the knifing....That would be absurd.
You are absurd. Your contribution in here has gone from obvious trolling to pretending that your trolling can actually be serious too.
If you wanted to address what my satire was arguing for, if it could be called an argument at all, it would be merely in agreeing with another poster on this same thread who jokingly said that Britain should next move to ban knives and naughty thoughts.
For some reason you have an expectation that you should be permitted to turn this thread into a screeching anti-Muslim hysteria that supposedly the British State is actively aiding and abetting. But since you have been told that such are the shitty ramblings of trolls like noir who command zero respect in this community, instead of letting go and moving on you are doubling-down and trying to give them an air of seriousness in the process digging yourself further into the pit of crap.
Thus, the argument that would've been made by me would be this: the UK has a problem with enforcing stupid laws (like censoring social media) instead of dealing with actual problems (such as Islamic immigrants with Jihadist sympathies). I also implied in my satire that the people that would end up suffering from a ban on knives, would be law abiding anglo-saxon protesant brits more so than blacks and muslims, and for the same reason this would be so in the United States with a gun ban. Those who commit crimes rarely possess their weapon legally and rarely care if that was a crime anyway.
Earlier, you said the problem(the rise of criminality) is British Muslims(has there an equivalent rise of British Muslims?) you even argued that citizenship laws should change to restrict Muslims from becoming citizens, now you say Islamic immigrants, then you add the Blacks, then you use "ethnic-minorities". All in all, you will say anything to make a connection with outgroups you hate even though this rise in crime has not been attributed to anything you suggest and nor have you even attempted to connect any statistics to explain this rise in crime. Yet you believe that screeching 'Muslims' loud enough makes something on-topic, just because people should consider it "common sense". Laughable.
Once again, I think you are being bit emotional about all this. I make some satire, then you get butt-hurt about it and try to make it into a debate over something I never specifically argued for.
Listen mate, if I were "butthurt" of anything I could make it vanish in a heartbeat, don't hold it against me that I am holding you to a higher standard than others, it's not cool.
...take your common sense with you, and leave your prejudices behind...