Wouldn't ever call the MSM liberal capitalist. Socially democratic and statist capitalist, sure, but it's not politically correct to be a liberal capitalist. You have to bias everything you say by some sort of progressivism or nationalism in order to convince people there's political capital to be had by consuming in the attention economy.
In short, anything intolerant (and unfunny) looks unprofessional, so you lose going that way.
News is not a financial capital sector. Even CNBC is advertisement after advertisement. The only reason to watch that is to seem sophisticated to unsavvy investors by playing it in a financial advisor's office.
If you want to watch real liberal-capitalist media, watch Bloomberg.
-----
Zagadka wrote:http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/06/24/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-june-23-2011/96490/
Code: Select allTotal Day P2+ 25-54 35-64
FNC 1,091 306 562
CNN 350 125 168
MSNBC 403 133 194
CNBC 175 56 96
Fox News completely dominates (columns by age)
Why are you whining about that? Start one. Your constant argument is that free market capitalism makes everything fair. If this holds, start up a right wing newspaper and gain that whole viewership.
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/05 ... wer-is-65/Fox News demographics are heavily biased. Once the baby boom generation passes, it won't be surprising to see a far more progressive-egalitarian-environmentalist bent take over.
Honestly, I don't see classic liberalism lasting 40 years from now. The social liberal paradigm embraces statism too tightly for independent free markets to have a chance, and the developed world service economy/developing world manufacturing economy will only reinforce the coming social spending and tax divides.