I posted documents showing 135,206 black on white rapes in 6 years.
You may remember minutes ago when
I went through the numbers via the government's own full and clear statement that the estimates from these numbers were from statistically insignificant sources.
You then threw the numbers out saying that, "My one and only point was that the main stream media never mentions this."
When asked
why the media would report on something that didn't hold up numerically, you changed the argument
again to standing by the numbers that you imagined were in the report because you didn't read the government's warnings about the unreliability of the numbers.
For your interpretation to be true, you need to not only discount the government's warning about the numbers but:
1. Ignore contemporary cases where whites are raping blacks that are big in the media, as has
already been pointed out on two occasions.
And then more.
2. Ignore
academic work that very clearly demonstrate that rape correlates with poverty far more than race.
3. Ignore that the year in question may have been an anomaly,
as has been pointed out, as subsequent years increase very much in white-on-black rapes.
4. Ignore the fact that your conclusion was drawn from an openly biased source that used the data you apparently didn't read closely as a source.
This was also already pointed out.
More than once.
5. Ignore regional parallels that make your conclusion problematic,
as has been pointed out.
6. Ignore historical parallels that make your conclusion problematic,
as has been pointed out.
7.
Propose a conspiracy theory to make up for your own lack of evidence.
Then double down on it.
8. Ignore the fact that rape is massively under-reported and there are sociological, demographic, and historical reasons why white-on-black crimes would be especially underreported—
as has been pointed out. And
ignore it again when repeated.
9. Ignore
requests to address any of these points that make your conclusion problematic.
10.
Move the goal posts for what you're actually talking about. Repeatedly.
11. Ignore
statistics from other sources that contradict the conclusion that you're drawing.
So I'll ask you—with all of this evidence directly contradicting your conclusion, are you going to even try to address this? Or are you so tied to a delusional reality that you will continue to simply restate a thoroughly debunked conclusion you're trying to draw from statistics that even warn you not to draw the conclusion that you're drawing?
Alis Volat Propriis; Tiocfaidh ár lá; Proletarier Aller Länder, Vereinigt Euch!