Hindsite wrote:I never said science is false. You keep trying to set up a straw man.
I just don't believe and put my trust in the theory of evolution to replace God as you do.
The problem is that people like you have included true science in with the theory of evolution in an attempt to make the theory of evolution seem like real science rather than a religious belief to replace the Christian religion. it's the old bait and switch idea. The gullible, like you, fall for it ever time.
I never said science is false. You keep trying to set up a straw man.
I just don't believe and put my trust in the theory of evolution to replace God as you do.
The problem is that people like you have included true science in with the theory of evolution in an attempt to make the theory of evolution seem like real science rather than a religious belief to replace the Christian religion. it's the old bait and switch idea. The gullible, like you, fall for it ever time.
YOU compound your ignorance in good measure, simply because you contradict yourself & twist things around to suit yourself, rather than addressing what is actually postulated.
You said, "I never said science is false".
Lets examine what you say here, "I just don't believe and put my trust in the theory of evolution to replace God as you do".
You "just don't believe and put my trust in the 'theory' of 'evolution".
1) 'Evolution' is a scientific FACT, it is NOT a 'theory', it is a proven FACT.
2)You said "I just don't believe and put my TRUST in the 'theory' of evolution to replace 'god' as you do".
I think that I smell a 'Straw Man' lurking here somewhere, you do not 'trust' 'evolution', which is a FACT, NOT a 'theory', so you are saying that you trust a 'theory' about your 'god', because it is a matter of 'FAITH' over 'FACT' & above the FACT of evolution.
In science, there is what is known as ,The Scientific Method, it's about , 'evidence', observation', 'experiment' & peer review.
Secondly, a 'theory' only becomes a scientific FACT, once it has passed ALL of the above, in the 'experiment' phase, it has to be observed repeatedly.
The Big Bang Theory is 'scientific MAINSTREAM theory, accepted because it is proven that at the early stage of the Big Bang, the conditions were specific to the creation of atoms from the sub-particles within quark gluon plasma.
All the other observations, including the laws of nature, including gravity, general\ special relativity, Quantum theory, the abstract nature of it's properties, are describing the effects of that event which will continue for all of time.
As with the Big Bang Theory, so too with
Evolution, both are subjected to the scientific Method.
Tell me to what logical methodology is your 'god' subjective to, in order to prove beyond all doubt, the existence of?
I will sum that one up as;-
'SCIENCE' = SIGMA 5
'God' = SIGMA 0.
I rest my case against you, reality is an alien concept to you, do keep taking the pills.