- 13 Jul 2017 12:04
#14823143
You chart is CO2 . . .
. . . not temperature.
The Immortal Goon wrote:Let us assume one of NOAA's data sets wasn't well thought out, or part of an elaborate conspiracy for no apparent reason at all.
This does not change NASA:
(Which, incidentally, isapparently threatening enough that the Trump administration is trying to stifle it)
The conspiracy would reach into the ESA and the UN. As well as all of the countries participating with these agencies.
The conspiracy to keep this data going would have to be by far the most vast conspiracy ever created. The amount of people that would have to be pulling the strings of this, at the same time, in different places all over the planet, are in the hundreds of thousands. And they'd have to all have been perfectly silent about the real data that they're altering.
The question is then begged, why?
What does everyone gain from this vast conspiracy?
On the other hand, what do people have to gain from denying climate change being related to humankind? This is a much easier question to answer, is it not? Surely the people making money from current policies wouldn't want a change.
You chart is CO2 . . .
. . . not temperature.