- 27 Nov 2019 20:28
#15051250
Can't you see that the whole premise of the WUWT spreadsheet is supposedly to list research papers.
In your own words you are having to accept that one of the items listed is no such thing. They have simply trawled for anything that fits a narrative to get a different result.
The study put forward in WUWT was looked at and of the additional papers added to prove cooling, only one was found to be a genuine research paper subject to the same scrutiny as those in the 2008 study (Wahl 1968).
Truth To Power wrote:. The report -- by multiple eminent scientists -- that references Starr and Oort (and scores of other papers) is therefore evidence for the consensus independent of the Starr and Oort paper.
Can't you see that the whole premise of the WUWT spreadsheet is supposedly to list research papers.
In your own words you are having to accept that one of the items listed is no such thing. They have simply trawled for anything that fits a narrative to get a different result.
The study put forward in WUWT was looked at and of the additional papers added to prove cooling, only one was found to be a genuine research paper subject to the same scrutiny as those in the 2008 study (Wahl 1968).