- 14 Oct 2023 16:11
#15290932
The manipulations, fallacies and fabrications, you mean. Not evidence.
Most of them only "contributed" in the sense that their work was referenced, and many of them reject the IPCC conclusions.
How many of them can you name off the top of your head, as you can Hausfather and the dozen or so others who most reliably grift for the CO2 narrative?
BeesKnee5 wrote:You mean the ones who accept the evidence you have been presented with.
The manipulations, fallacies and fabrications, you mean. Not evidence.
13,000 scientists contributed to the IPCC AR6 report.
Most of them only "contributed" in the sense that their work was referenced, and many of them reject the IPCC conclusions.
I'd call that more than a dozen.
How many of them can you name off the top of your head, as you can Hausfather and the dozen or so others who most reliably grift for the CO2 narrative?