DARPA does it again: Laser weapons hit battlefield strength - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Military vehicles, aircraft, ships, guns and other military equipment. Plus any general military discussions that don't belong elsewhere on the board.

Moderator: PoFo The Lounge Mods

#1849372
Anyone else thinking that a hundred years from now we'll be able to see something like this in orbit?

Image

These breakthroughs in directed energy weapons in parallel with those for railgun technology are definitely going to make warfare pretty interesting this century.

Edit: Found a great vid of another Laser design under development. Really hammers home the point of them being almost ready.
Video

Source
Military Laser Hits Battlefield Strength

By Noah Shachtman

Huge news for real-life ray guns: Electric lasers have hit battlefield strength for the first time -- paving the way for energy weapons to go to war.

In recent test-blasts, Pentagon-researchers at Northrop Grumman managed to get its 105 kilowatts of power out of their laser -- past the "100kW threshold [that] has been viewed traditionally as a proof of principle for 'weapons grade' power levels for high-energy lasers," Northrop's vice president of directed energy systems, Dan Wildt, said in a statement.

That much power won't get you a Star Wars-style blaster. But it should be more than enough to zap the mortars and rockets that insurgents have used to pound American bases in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The battlefield-strength breakthrough is just one part in a larger military push to finally make laser weapons a reality, after decades of unfulfilled promises. The Army recently gave Boeing a $36 million contract to build a laser-equipped truck. Raytheon is set to start test-firing a mortar-zapper of its own. Darpa is funding a 150 kilowatt laser project that is meant to be fitted onto "tactical aircraft."

Does that mean energy weapons are a done deal? Hardly. There are still all sorts of technical issues -- thermal management and miniaturization, to name two -- that have to be handled first. Then, the ray gunners have to find the money. The National Academies figure it'll take another $100 million to get battlefield lasers right.

Still, clearing the 100 kilowatt hurdle is a big deal. For the longest time, the military research community concentrated on developing chemical-powered lasers. The ray guns produced massively powerful laser blasts. But the noxious stuff needed to produce all that power makes the weapons all-but-impractical in a war zone. (One ray gun took as many as eight shipping containers' worth of chemicals and electronics to power a single blaster.) So the Defense Department shifted gears, and poured money into electric lasers. They're much less hassle to operate. And, given a steady supply of power, they should be able to fire away, almost indefinitely.

At first, these electric lasers were weak. When the military started its Joint High Power Solid State Laser (JHPSSL) program in 2003, these easy-to-maintain lasters could barely produce more than 10 kilowatts of coherent light. Now, Northrop believes, going way past 100 kilowatts should be pretty simple.

In its lab, south of Los Angeles, Northrop combines 32 garnet crystal "modules" into a "laser amplifier chains." Shine light-emitting diodes into 'em, and they start the laser chain-reaction, shooting out as much as 15 kilowatts of focused light. Combine all those beams into one, and you've got yourself a battlefield-strength ray. Northrop's JHPSSL lasers used seven chains to get to 105 kilowatts. But there's room, at least, for an eighth. Which means an even stronger blaster.

The next step is to start trying out the ray gun, outside of the lab. The Army is planning to move the device to its High Energy Laser Systems Test Facility at White Sands Missile Range. Testing is supposed to begin by this time, next year.


R edit: As much as I like this article, International Relations isn't the place for it.
User avatar
By Rodion
#1849398
Piano Red wrote:These breakthroughs in directed energy weapons in parallel with those for railgun technology are definitely going to make warfare pretty interesting this century.


I assume by "interesting" you mean "terrifying". Sure, lasers may look good on camera in a dust storm, but what you get on the battlefield is an invisible ray of dick-slicing death.
User avatar
By ThereBeDragons
#1849401
We have a military hardware forum. [[EDIT]] That was fast.

The enemies of America shall burn.
User avatar
By Thunderhawk
#1849541
I wonder what the life span of those crystals are..

..and how I can get in on this field.
By Piano Red
#1849659
When the hell did we get a Military Hardware forum?

And why am I just now finding out about it? :knife:
User avatar
By Oxymoron
#1849722
Excellent, this is what we need to maintain our dominance.
User avatar
By Igor Antunov
#1860134
Why not find a way to power larger strategic laser systems with portable nuclear reactors?
By Piano Red
#1861109
Rodion
I assume by "interesting" you mean "terrifying".


To our rivals and enemies?

Hopefully. 8)

Sure, lasers may look good on camera in a dust storm, but what you get on the battlefield is an invisible ray of dick-slicing death.


Which is awesome beyond compare.

If this sucker works as they hope it could save us troop lives, thats the important part from my perspective.

What was that line I heard a lil while back: "people don't mind people being shot, as long as it's the right people being shot"

Also I feel its always better to have increased accuracy weapons kill specific targets then inaccurate weapons taking out bystanders & human shields. People will always be killing people. We are not a pacifistic species. As such it's better to be the first to have superior weapon technology in the efforts of making the other poor dumb bastard die for his cause and not you for yours. Secondly, it's being used as an APS; for shooting down mortars, rockets, etc. That saves lives if anything since a laser like that is extremely inefficient for killing humans.

We're still quite a ways off from having Star Wars type blaster rifles.

Igor Antunovic
Why not find a way to power larger strategic laser systems with portable nuclear reactors?


Too unwieldy, no stated design purpose other than having a hugely powerful laser, and potential chances of power conversion difficulties. I would assume that with the amount of power flowing from a nuclear reactor there'd be extreme potential for the lasers to be burned out rather than operate correctly. The technology just isn't up to that point yet.
Israel-Palestinian War 2023

I have never been wacko at anything. I never thou[…]

I think a Palestinian state has to be demilitariz[…]

no , i am not gonna do it. her grandfather was a[…]

did you know it ? shocking information , any comme[…]