China to downsize army to under a million in biggest troop cut - Politics | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Military vehicles, aircraft, ships, guns and other military equipment. Plus any general military discussions that don't belong elsewhere on the board.

Moderator: PoFo The Lounge Mods

China will downsize its 2.3 million-strong military, the world's largest, to under one million in the biggest troop reduction in its history as part of a restructuring process, an official Chinese daily said.

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) will increase the numbers of other services, including navy and missile forces, the PLA Daily, the official newspaper of the Chinese military, reported.

Jun Zhengping Studio, a Chinese social WeChat account run by the newspaper published an article yesterday on structural reform in the military, saying that "the old military structure, where the army accounts for the vast majority, will be replaced after the reform". ... s?from=mdr

Army will shrink dramatically, air-force and navy will increase dramatically. Going for an imperial/mobile conquest build. This coincides with the opening of China's first military base abroad in Djibouti, Africa. It has invested over $16 billion in the port of Djibouti and linked it's economic interests there to the base.
Wow, this is huge news. I'm not sure how I feel about this. China is not a seapower, it is a landpower that happens to be developing seapower, but, like the United States, it is an Army power first and naval power second. Reducing the force structure this radically- if they carry through- is potentially dangerous since it signals a dramatic shift in strategic policy. Mass amphibious landings in Taiwan, or a border dispute with Russia, or DPRK for example, now become much riskier options. China's Navy is ultimately a luxury navy, and this would change would dramatically alter how the prepared China is for a conflict in the near future. Downsizing 300,000 to a million soldiers and expanding the PLAAF and PLAN will require an extensive period of reorganization during which time capability would be significantly weakened. Further, this suggests an intention to accelerate the naval arms race with the United States, which, if the numbers i've seen for debt to GDP figures are accurate, (more than 100% for both countries, as much as 300% for China), neither state can afford this.
Downsizing 300,000 to a million soldiers and expanding the PLAAF and PLAN will require an extensive period of reorganization

Ground forces are still comprised of 1.6 million soldiers. Many more than that, the previous cuts are not yet complete. As before most of them with their training and work experience will join the PAP (people's armed police, a paramilitary organization) who now number close to 1.5 million. They are internal border guards and a secondary standing reserve force. You see them standing around guarding public property in their green police uniforms and they don their black riot gear and white armored vehicles when quelling protests. They might also opt for the regular public police, who are unarmed but who are severely lacking. China only has ~2 million police officers, per capita that is completely inadequate. The Coast Guard (which belongs to PAP) is also being expanded dramatically. Another possible alternative.

So Beijing receives the dual benefit of streamlining/speeding up modernization of its armed forces, and also bolstering security domestically. There is absolutely no need for such a large standing force of professional troops. Conscription only exists on paper and has done so for decades now, and reserve duties take the guise of only 500,000 part time reservists and the full time PAP. At any one time there are ~5 million men with extensive military service experience that can be called up immediately, and a further 70 million potential conscripts that could undergo basic training. (Male and Female members of the Chinese communist party-a prerequisite for joining the armed forces in any capacity).

By shrinking the ground forces, and transferring them to cheaper to maintain PAP or to the civilian sector; they can afford to procure and maintain many more modern aircraft, warships, etc. The largest component of the military budget is maintaining salaries of full time soldiers.

This would transfer the strategic standing of the PLA entirely, from one of defense and focus on fighting a land war in Asia, to offense with focus on power projection abroad. It is growing apparent that China does not expect to be fighting any major ground conflicts on land. This is evident with the pan-Asian One Belt, One Road initiative. Instead, it is gearing up for limited high intensity conflicts in the Pacific, Indian Ocean, Africa, etc. This means having a credible deterrent that can safeguard its sea trade routes and east coast and also an air-force that would pose a major threat to any regional fleets or airbases.
China has so many missiles than any conflict near their borders is a suicide mission, but they are totally incapable of matching the US anywhere away from their borders. These changes simply demonstrate their intentions of entering into an expansionist period. The world views them as not being aggressors, but that is only because they did not have the capabilities. We are now seeing their goals are no different than any other power, domination.

What does any of this have to do with climate cha[…]

This is ALL anyone needs to know about Madeline &q[…]

Do we owe reparations to LGBT?

We owe "reparations" to queers because B[…]

The Next UK PM everybody...

Although some PoFoers are absolutely not concerne[…]