Flamethrowers - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Military vehicles, aircraft, ships, guns and other military equipment. Plus any general military discussions that don't belong elsewhere on the board.

Moderator: PoFo The Lounge Mods

User avatar
By Klontius Pilatus
#1113691
Very cool. Unfortunately illigal in Sout Africa
User avatar
By Boondock Saint
#1113720
Very cool. Unfortunately illigal in Sout Africa



Flame throwers are illegal across the globe. I doubt any nation would be so bold as to employ them.
User avatar
By Unperson-S
#1114358
There is no oxygen in space, so fire wouldn't ignite.


You could feed it with oxygen.
User avatar
By The Red Menace
#1120537
A country should use flamethrowers in defense. A wall of fire will stop the attackers in their tracks.

PS. I could also feed oxygen into my ass.
By Smilin' Dave
#1120591
A country should use flamethrowers in defense. A wall of fire will stop the attackers in their tracks.

If the attacking force is armed with swords maybe...

Otherwise the torrents of flame will trace back to their firing position, making their neutralisation with ranged fire fairly easy.

Not to mention the gross waste of fuel this would entail.

IIRC the British experimented with a flamethrower on ships to deter divebombing. Didn't really work for them.

Well that's the thing.. he was wrong A paper, by[…]

What bill are you talking about?

Those who were buried do not have a burial date pr[…]

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/178385974554[…]