- 09 Nov 2017 17:10
#14861066
But at least the U.S. considers itself western, as do any Canadians that aren't cucks or foreign. Latinos have embraced themselves as the victims of western colonial oppression and have distinguished their identity from the west. If there was a pan-western nationalist movement, most latinos would opt out.
No, they are less successful than ALL of those that are openly western, including Europe, generally speaking. Plus, the incompetency to creating a prosperous nation in spite of available resources has been symptomatic of non-western nations and attitudes.
Sure, but Americans have given their main concerns for voting for Trump as "Fear of Cultural Displacement," If we shared a common western culture, this wouldn't have been the main fear, but it would have been economic concerns or security concerns. Americans would not have the same opposition to unvetted white-English immigration and that is just a fact (unless such threatened jobs or security). Americans don't want Mexicans in because of major cultural differences and attitude differences. Something that should not exist if we shared a common civilization.
"It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals... is incompatible with freedom."
- Patrick Henry
SolarCross wrote:As native brit I could say the same thing about north americans. "Technically they speak... etc" Of course Africa did get a dose of westernisation, but it perhaps was not a sufficiently large dose to completely change them. America had a heavier dose of westernisation from the sustained Spanish and Portuguese colonisation as much as North American received from other Europeans actually.
But at least the U.S. considers itself western, as do any Canadians that aren't cucks or foreign. Latinos have embraced themselves as the victims of western colonial oppression and have distinguished their identity from the west. If there was a pan-western nationalist movement, most latinos would opt out.
SolarCross wrote:Ah so it is that they are less successful than there North American cousins that makes hesitant to admit them into the western club?
No, they are less successful than ALL of those that are openly western, including Europe, generally speaking. Plus, the incompetency to creating a prosperous nation in spite of available resources has been symptomatic of non-western nations and attitudes.
SolarCross wrote:It doesn't matter immigration policy is a national policy not a western one. They can be as western as anyone and still be refused entry for any number of reasons.
Sure, but Americans have given their main concerns for voting for Trump as "Fear of Cultural Displacement," If we shared a common western culture, this wouldn't have been the main fear, but it would have been economic concerns or security concerns. Americans would not have the same opposition to unvetted white-English immigration and that is just a fact (unless such threatened jobs or security). Americans don't want Mexicans in because of major cultural differences and attitude differences. Something that should not exist if we shared a common civilization.
"It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals... is incompatible with freedom."
- Patrick Henry