- 15 Jun 2018 22:55
#14924894
Pornography should not be banned. It should be permitted - not because it is good for society, but because it is destructive of individuals.
Pornography purifies the population by reducing the fertility rate of the people weak enough to be enslaved by their own sexual desires, and lacking in any nobler desires strong enough to counterbalance their addiction to pornogrpahy.
The more addicted people become to pornography, the lower their rate of reproduction; the more obsessed they are with what other people do with their genitals, the more they tend to isolate themselves from society; at the same time their social isolation, their increasingly warped view of human sexuality, and the adverse psychological effects of the addiction itself, makes porn addicts less desirable to members of the opposite sex, less likely to ascend the social hierarchy, etc. As a result of the widespread availability of pornography, many weak-willed people have made themselves even weaker than they would otherwise have been; let us hope they will eventually stop breeding, so that the human population will become stronger.
The more widely available pornography is, the greater the number of weak people that will get hooked on pornography. Therefore expose everyone to pornography - maximise the number of weaklings that you can remove from the population, by getting as many of them hooked on porn as possible.
But pornography is just one of many evils that should be expanded. It probably only has a slight effect on the overall fertility rate - but it is just one among countless vices, addictions, evils, etc., all of which have an additive effect on the fertility rate of the population.
Even lies can have a beneficial effect on the population, if the lies lead people stupid enough to fall for them not to have children. This is why lies should be widely disseminated. The more people you can fool into destroying themselves on the basis of lies, the fewer fools you will have. Ideally only the people that were strong enough to see through lies should reproduce themselves. Every child needs to be fed lies that result in their own ruin if believed in, so that only those immune to the lies will survive.
If you want to strengthen a population, you make things like drugs and pornography as widely available to the public as possible, no matter how many lives have to be destroyed in the process. Ideally you want 100% of the population to be exposed to pornography, highly addictive drugs, etc. Self-destructive behaviour should be made out to be as rewarding as possible. To convince as many people as possible that what destroys them is actually good for them - this is the greatest act of charity conceivable.
What happens is all the weak-willed people get addicted to heroin, methamphetamine, pornography, video games, etc., etc. They make themselves more and more undesirable to the opposite sex, while squandering their most fertile and productive years enslaved to their addictions or self-destructive behaviours. As a result, their rate of reproduction is diminished (while their death rate tends to increase).
Consequence: after a few generations, the weak of will become less and less numerous. Those stupid enough to fall for our lies will be weeded out of the population. Humanity will thus be strengthened by evil, purified by vice.
Abortion is also good, because those who think it is fine to abort their children will have fewer children; those who don't place the highest priority on their own survival and reproduction will constitute a lower and lower proportion of the population with every generation, while those opposed to abortion, or for whom the desire to populate the planet with more people like themselves overrides the desire to destroy their own flesh and blood, will constitute a larger and larger percentage of the population. This is why abortion should be as widely available as possible.
The same logic applies to pornography and to every other evil. All evil is good, because it results in the destruction of what ought to be destroyed. Evil should be promoted and encouraged for the general population - while we abstrain from such behaviour ourselves.
But never be deluded by what the masses call 'evil'. What they call 'evil' I call 'predatory', i.e. a good. They are too weak to be predatory; they fear the predatory, and it is this fear that they call 'evil', 'diabolical', 'satanic'. The world needs more of that kind of 'evil', far more of it than at present; the populace has become too domesticated. We need to cultivate more of that evil in ourselves - breed more of it into existence. And to strengthen the masses, we need to promote and encourage the other kind of evil - addictions, sins, vices, etc.
Ideology: Liberalism
We are put on earth a little space,
That we may learn to bear the beams of love.
~ William Blake