Porn can be banned as effectively as alcohol was in the US prohibition days, or prostitution has disappeared because someone made it illegal.
Banning pornography is a pipe dream by puritan morons.
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Pants-of-dog wrote:No. The ones who evolved traits that make them able to survive and reproduce are the ones who survive, reproduce, and pass on these evolved traits.
It has nothing to do with purpose.
Please note that all organisms that use sexual reproduction have evolved to survive and reproduce. Using your logic, all of these organisms are sexual objects.
If you want to consider earthworms, marijuana plants, and me as sex objects, go ahead.
Truth to power wrote:The human female, almost uniquely among all animals, has evolved to engage in much more non-reproductive than reproductive sex. This non-reproductive sexual activity has no purpose but the sexual gratification of the male.This is your OPINION. Would you care to support this with some facts, or a source, please?
Truth To Power wrote:You are equivocating on the words, "to" and "purpose." "To" in this sense means having as a result, not as a goal, and "purpose" means function, not design or direction.
No, that's just more garbage from you. The human female, almost uniquely among all animals, has evolved to engage in much more non-reproductive than reproductive sex. This non-reproductive sexual activity has no purpose but the sexual gratification of the male.
Try not to be so obtuse.
Godstud wrote:This is your OPINION.
Would you care to support this with some facts, or a source, please?
Note: The science seems against such a "uniqueness", and turfs your idea pretty readily.
It is often assumed that animals do not have sex for pleasure, or alternatively that humans, pigs, bonoboes (and perhaps dolphins and one or two more species of primates) are the only species that do. This is sometimes stated as "animals mate only for reproduction". This view is considered a misconception by some scholars.
Jonathan Balcombe argues that the prevalence of non-reproductive sexual behaviour in certain species suggests that sexual stimulation is pleasurable. He also points to the presence of the clitoris in some female mammals, and evidence for female orgasm in primates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sexual_behaviourDo Animals Have Sex for Fun
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/2014061 ... ex-for-fun
Truth to power wrote:Yes, and I hold that opinion because it is true.Truth is very subjective, and often an opinion. Facts are not.
Godstud wrote:Banning pornography is a pipe dream by puritan morons.
blackjack21 wrote:Women aren't equal and pornography isn't degrading.Do you have something to actually say, or is the usual trolling fuckery you do?
OK so lets get this clear, If I want to black m[…]
You haven't got one shred of evidence that proves[…]
Actually, Special Olympian already provided video[…]