Let's Ban Porn - Page 5 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Traditional 'common sense' values and duty to the state.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
User avatar
By Zamuel
#14920957
Godstud wrote:It's not a myth, Albert. Don't let Igor's poor skills tell you otherwise.

I can confirm that. I think it's an attunement and synchronization of neural signal overlap.

As for Porn? It's had a very positive effect on Human society. You can say it projects women as sex objects … Ok, - WOMEN ARE SEX OBJECTS - … and many of them enjoy it. The trick is realizing that that's not ALL they are.

Zam :eek:
User avatar
By Albert
#14920966
Look at all the perverts coming out of the woodwork once you mention taking their porn away.

Wow Zam, you are very enlightened on this subject.
User avatar
By Igor Antunov
#14920968
Godstud wrote:Speak for yourself. It's only a myth if you suck in the bedroom :D


I hate to break it to you but...Asian girls can act.

If she's not lying to you, then you're lucky enough to have found the 1 in 1,000. Good for you. :D

IMO statistical anomalies are myth in my book.

And I changed my mind. We should ban everything. Hive mind is the future.
User avatar
By Godstud
#14920970
Igor Antunov wrote:I hate to break it to you but...Asian girls can act.
I hate to break it to you, but the natural bkiological reactions that the body does cannot be "faked".

Igor Antunov wrote:If she's not lying to you, then you're lucky enough to have found the 1 in 1,000.
I'd doubt that they're even as uncommon as 1 in 10.
User avatar
By Zamuel
#14920992
Albert wrote:Wow Zam, you are very enlightened on this subject.

Yes, I am Albert. I'm rather jaded, most of it is of little interest personally. But I've had an inside view of it's effect. It's eliminated what was once a very seedy but lucrative business in the USA. It's shut down at least half the local titty bars / gentleman's clubs. It's eliminated street prostitution around here. The old "whoreville" motels are being remodeled into rehab and early release centers. STDs are way down. Child abuse has dropped significantly. Human trafficking has been exposed and is now being investigated and prosecuted. ALL THIS (and more) because a forbidden commodity became freely available on the internet.

If you think going back to that stuff is "Better" ? You are indeed sick.

Zam :smokin:
By anasawad
#14921103
If you want your female sexual partner (girlfriend, wife,etc.) to have the "scream worthy orgasm", then you have to do foreplay and do it hard before the sex starts. And when you go in, preferably you have a clear idea of the sensitive spots you should go for, as well as her preferences and likes and dislikes.

Do that and it'll no longer become a myth.
By Truth To Power
#14921231
Zamuel wrote:WOMEN ARE SEX OBJECTS - … and many of them enjoy it.

Very true. From a biological standpoint, it is clear that the human female has evolved very specifically to be a sex object, to provide sexual gratification to the male. By objecting to this fact and its logical implications, modern "feminism" reveals itself to be anti-feminine.
User avatar
By Zamuel
#14921248
Truth To Power wrote:Very true. From a biological standpoint, it is clear that the human female has evolved very specifically to be a sex object, to provide sexual gratification to the male. By objecting to this fact and its logical implications, modern "feminism" reveals itself to be anti-feminine.

Feminism-Shmemanism, as a sex object she fulfills her reproductive role and is transformed into a mother, she propels humanity into the future. Nothing could be more natural or satisfying. It's not demeaning and it's not "Masculine Exploitation." It's natures way of telling you, "NOTHINGS WRONG."

Zam :angel:
By Truth To Power
#14921622
Pants-of-dog wrote:Organisms do not evolve for a purpose. Teleology is not science.

Wrong, as usual. They evolve to survive and reproduce. For the human female, that has meant being a good sex object. Refusal to know facts is not an argument, sorry.
User avatar
By Zamuel
#14921631
Albert wrote:I believe Zam is a prophet of rape culture.

Sorry, no, if I were a prophet I could snap my fingers and you would burst into flame and shrivel up like a dead rat …

Zam
By Pants-of-dog
#14921632
Truth To Power wrote:Wrong, as usual. They evolve to survive and reproduce. For the human female, that has meant being a good sex object. Refusal to know facts is not an argument, sorry.


No. The ones who evolved traits that make them able to survive and reproduce are the ones who survive, reproduce, and pass on these evolved traits.

It has nothing to do with purpose.

Please note that all organisms that use sexual reproduction have evolved to survive and reproduce. Using your logic, all of these organisms are sexual objects.

If you want to consider earthworms, marijuana plants, and me as sex objects, go ahead.
User avatar
By Albert
#14921635
Zamuel wrote:Sorry, no, if I were a prophet I could snap my fingers and you would burst into flame and shrivel up like a dead rat …

Zam
Are you a preacher of rape culture then?
By Rich
#14921640
This is just a silly idea. Banning paedophile porn is a hard enough task for the authorities. A significant percentage of the UK prison population is in for peodo porn. That's only going to increase, because they are going to catch ever more first time offenders and the first time offenders will become second and third time offenders and have to be given even longer sentences. Within a few years the majority of the prison population will be in for peodo internet porn. And of course this is while we give carte blanche to Muslim rapists.

The idea of banning porn is as much a fantasy, completely un-moored from reality as the porn they want to ban
User avatar
By Albert
#14921663
Child pornography is a bit different to banning porn. Banning porn will most likely look from legislative prospective of prohibiting of sale and distribution of pornography. It would not necessary lead to policing if people watch or not.
User avatar
By Zamuel
#14921669
Albert wrote:Are you a preacher of rape culture then?

No, I am an angel of freedom sent by god to dispel these evil illusions … :angel:

Look into my eyes Albert and - be thou blinded. -

Zam - (ah that went well - someone wash his pants out for him) :lol:
User avatar
By Suntzu
#14921670
How can you (effectively) ban porn when everyone with a smartphone is a potential porn factory. Hey Susie, send me a picture of your twinkie! 8)
User avatar
By Albert
#14921677
You can not, but you can ban distribution with intent to sell. Hence limiting the exposure to pornographic material.
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Election 2020

And in another likely case of "mostly peacefu[…]

Please note that once again you have repeated the[…]

Please note that he was also charged with crimes […]

Demographics won't cut it. Can you provide evide[…]