[KhawarezmLLC]

Wikipedia was founded around the same time PoliticsForum was founded, 2003.

Wikipedia's focus was on endorsing Africa. Among other things, there were lots of politics involved in editing Wikipedia. If it was the political debate that provoked young African to edit Wikipedia, they were invited to PoliticsForum.

Political debate was how the democracy behind those systems generated revenues. Usually a Wikipedia article would start as an art, then -after historical superiority was established- as a culture, and finally as distant-education.

Example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... on=history

Yup, only after Africans were involved in educating Americans that a Wikipedia article was settled.

[Robert Urbanek]

Wikipedia was founded around the same time PoliticsForum was founded, 2003.

Wikipedia's focus was on endorsing Africa. Among other things, there were lots of politics involved in editing Wikipedia. If it was the political debate that provoked young African to edit Wikipedia, they were invited to PoliticsForum.

Political debate was how the democracy behind those systems generated revenues. Usually a Wikipedia article would start as an art, then -after historical superiority was established- as a culture, and finally as distant-education.

Example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... on=history

Yup, only after Africans were involved in educating Americans that a Wikipedia article was settled.

The Wikipedia article on Wikipedia does not make any mention of the African influence that you claim.

[Rancid]

My understanding is that Wikipedia is actually very accurate when it comes to hard sciences. However, when its a topic that is political or subjective, it's all over the fucking place.

[orphan]

Any personal experience with subjectivity on USENET newsgroups?