- 24 Mar 2011 18:25
#13664561
This discussion, or at least the one I am attempting to have as per the OP, is about why some people on this board feel the need to hijack threads about feminism into discussions about how feminists oppress men.
Ter, can I ask you why you brought up the issue of paternity tests in divorce in the misogyny thread but not the divorce thread? It would seem that the issue is even more related to the issue of divorce than miosgyny.
If that was what had been done, then I might agree. But that is not the case. Ter did not address the issue of whether or not misgyny exists. He just started talking about how "the woman is always certain that her babies have her DNA but daddy isn't so sure, especially if his woman is allowed to go outside and get unseen stray fucks."
I did not say that taking a differing view is derailment.
There is a difference from taking a different view on a subject, and changing the subject altogether. For example, you and I disagree right now on whether or not hijacking took place. You think one thing. I think the other. But if I were to start talking about how this is all about libertarian memes about Ayn rand, that would be changing the subject.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
Ter wrote:Discussion ? What discussion ?
You and Yiwa are just bullying everybody out of your threads unless they sing your song.
Do you have any problem with me defending Oxy (or others) when you intimidate him with your so-called superior education ?
Never mind, I don't need your permission. This is a discussion board and it does not belong to you or Yiwa.
Ter
This discussion, or at least the one I am attempting to have as per the OP, is about why some people on this board feel the need to hijack threads about feminism into discussions about how feminists oppress men.
Ter, can I ask you why you brought up the issue of paternity tests in divorce in the misogyny thread but not the divorce thread? It would seem that the issue is even more related to the issue of divorce than miosgyny.
Oxymoron wrote:No its called disagreeing with the premise. Like if someone said how do you stop the liberal menace, and someone pointed out that there is no such thing and converesly the conservatives are the real menace. Basically its called a debate, if you cant handle opposing view points create a blog.
If that was what had been done, then I might agree. But that is not the case. Ter did not address the issue of whether or not misgyny exists. He just started talking about how "the woman is always certain that her babies have her DNA but daddy isn't so sure, especially if his woman is allowed to go outside and get unseen stray fucks."
No some people against feminism may say things of a personal nature, or be rude and that is true of the feminist side. Taking an differing view is not derailment.
I did not say that taking a differing view is derailment.
There is a difference from taking a different view on a subject, and changing the subject altogether. For example, you and I disagree right now on whether or not hijacking took place. You think one thing. I think the other. But if I were to start talking about how this is all about libertarian memes about Ayn rand, that would be changing the subject.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...