Motivations for thread-jacking - Page 5 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

All sociological topics not appropriate or suited to other areas of the board.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
By Pants-of-dog
#13664561
Ter wrote:Discussion ? What discussion ?
You and Yiwa are just bullying everybody out of your threads unless they sing your song.

Do you have any problem with me defending Oxy (or others) when you intimidate him with your so-called superior education ?
Never mind, I don't need your permission. This is a discussion board and it does not belong to you or Yiwa.

Ter


This discussion, or at least the one I am attempting to have as per the OP, is about why some people on this board feel the need to hijack threads about feminism into discussions about how feminists oppress men.

Ter, can I ask you why you brought up the issue of paternity tests in divorce in the misogyny thread but not the divorce thread? It would seem that the issue is even more related to the issue of divorce than miosgyny.

Oxymoron wrote:No its called disagreeing with the premise. Like if someone said how do you stop the liberal menace, and someone pointed out that there is no such thing and converesly the conservatives are the real menace. Basically its called a debate, if you cant handle opposing view points create a blog.


If that was what had been done, then I might agree. But that is not the case. Ter did not address the issue of whether or not misgyny exists. He just started talking about how "the woman is always certain that her babies have her DNA but daddy isn't so sure, especially if his woman is allowed to go outside and get unseen stray fucks."

No some people against feminism may say things of a personal nature, or be rude and that is true of the feminist side. Taking an differing view is not derailment.


I did not say that taking a differing view is derailment.

There is a difference from taking a different view on a subject, and changing the subject altogether. For example, you and I disagree right now on whether or not hijacking took place. You think one thing. I think the other. But if I were to start talking about how this is all about libertarian memes about Ayn rand, that would be changing the subject.
User avatar
By Ter
#13664572
Pants-of-dog wrote:Ter, can I ask you why you brought up the issue of paternity tests in divorce in the misogyny thread but not the divorce thread? It would seem that the issue is even more related to the issue of divorce than miosgyny.


You can. I brought this issue up, to a great extent, in my thread about divorce and the way women are advantaged by it in the forum opinion polls some time back. Most if not all pofo contributors agreed with me that it is a scandal that paternity tests are prohibited legally in several countries.
I did not feel like participating in your thread about divorce because you were celebrating the breakdown of a family. I find that pretty disgusting.

Ter
By Pants-of-dog
#13664579
Ter wrote:I did not feel like participating in your thread about divorce because you were celebrating the breakdown of a family. I find that pretty disgusting.


My family is still intact. Those were my kids sitting at our kitchen table this morning eating the eggs I made for them. My ex-wife's brother still pours me a beer out of his pitcher without even asking me when we are at a party. Most importantly, my ex-wife is still my friend.

But you do agree that the issue of paternity tests during divorce is related to divorce and how we decide to approach it?
User avatar
By Ter
#13664590
Pants-of-dog wrote:My family is still intact.

Really ? Then why did you call it a divorce ?

Pants-of-dog wrote:Those were my kids sitting at our kitchen table this morning eating the eggs I made for them.

You have custody, or are you just allowed to see them one day every two weeks ?
I am sorry if this sounds harsh, but this situation was created by your party, not mine.

Pants-of-dog wrote:Most importantly, my ex-wife is still my friend.

Sure. She just wanted you out of her life, OK. Duh ?

Pants-of-dog wrote:But you do agree that the issue of paternity tests during divorce is related to divorce and how we decide to approach it?

Yes, but there is nothing to decide. Paternity test should be allowed, with or without lawful consent.
Anything else is just feminist thinking and should be vigorously opposed.

Now, if there is anything else, it will have to be postponed for 12 hours because of our different time zones.


Ter
By Pants-of-dog
#13664604
Ter wrote:Really ? Then why did you call it a divorce ?

Sure. She just wanted you out of her life, OK. Duh ?


If you wish to discuss my divorce, please do so in the appropriate thread.

Ter wrote:Yes, but there is nothing to decide. Paternity test should be allowed, with or without lawful consent.
Anything else is just feminist thinking and should be vigorously opposed.

Now, if there is anything else, it will have to be postponed for 12 hours because of our different time zones.


So, you post about your paternity issue in threads that are related to the issue, but not all of them. Apparently there are other criteria as well. What are those criteria?

Maybe all the Puerto Ricans who agree with you wi[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

@Potemkin They've spent the best part of two […]

Whats "breaking" here ? Russians have s[…]

@Puffer Fish You dig a trench avoiding existin[…]