QatzelOk wrote:I just have to demonstrate that the oppression and suffering of women is a predictable consequence of every war, that our leaders have access to history books that show this, and that they just don't care.~ That our media promotes some wars (like in Afghanistan) as being somehow "feminist" demonstrates how little our elite care about women or the truth. ~ They just say what they have to to get their wars of predation off the ground. War is always terrible for women and minorities. Perhaps the reason Kurdistan needs a new country now is because the tramautized mess of Iraq will predictably end in their holocaust. Wars do those kinds of things as well. It's predictable, and thus, was part of our elite's scheming: "How can we hide the atrocities that our wars will cause?" "Mass media spin."
Then one could fairly say that a Country, having currency as a means to acquire staples and other items, has the predictable consequence of inflicting suffering and is an oppressive tactic.
I could conclude from your points then, that the Government and the Military themselves are the cause for these problems. Here when I say this, I do not mean their actions, but their very existence encourages oppressive tactics.
The Government would be doing so, in allowing an open free market and by using a structure that utilizes a system that demands work in exchange for compensation and benefits. The Military just by existing creates and propagates the existence of the alpha predatory male.
Would having just females make up the government, or as soldiers change this? Or is the problem a breakdown of the system, rather than a gender based defect?