Decky wrote:Do you think you will ever come out?
So do you think Stalin and Gorky were closet homosexuals then?
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Decky wrote:Do you think you will ever come out?
Agent Steel wrote:Why is being selective with who you have sex with a bad thing?
Heisenberg wrote:I almost feel sorry for the Dutch. 17 million people and their only PoFo representatives are Sabb and Maas. It's definitely turned all of us against them.
Decky wrote:Na, anyway if Stalin was having a bromance with anyone surely it was Kalinin?
Rancid wrote:Where the white women at?
MistyTiger wrote:Researchers found that beauty is based on perfect or near perfect symmetry and the golden ratio. It makes sense. We like perfection and flawlessness. If one eye is noticeable bigger than the other people are likely to find it unattractive or freakish.
MistyTiger wrote:But generally the ideal beauty is one that is statuesque as portrayed by grecian marble statues.
One Degree wrote:I believe this is a ‘human sense’ we simply don’t understand yet.
Suntzu wrote:This is what she looks like now.
layman wrote:On the other side I think men are actually less bias but part of that is probably the macho variety thing.
layman wrote:Men tend to prefer petit women and delicate features.
One Degree wrote:@Oxymandias You said generalizations are not bad and did an excellent job of explaining it. Then you attacked his generalization???
Oxymandias wrote:Basing your political beliefs on generalizations is foolhardy at best and dangerous at worst.
Agent Steel wrote:You desperately want to believe that don't you? I can tell.
Oxymandias wrote:You realize there is no difference between an African's skeleton, an Arab's skeleton, an Asians skeleton, etc. right? I think you need google what anthropology is before you say something stupid like that.
Political Interest wrote:I think the Western men who express a preference for Asian ladies are racist.
Political Interest wrote:But, if you absolutely refuse anyone of a different background then I think it is racist.
MistyTiger wrote:3 major races? What are those races? I'm confused like Rancid.
Rancid wrote:It is funny that often times, threads like this turn into sexist misogynist threads. Basically, a bunch of dudes come together to denounce someone's racism. However, at the same time, they just start posting images of women from different races and start objectifying them.
Oxymandias wrote:Yeah, women should discard all of their individualism, their identities, and everything else that provides them with a sense of self in favor of meeting the expectations of us, men, who are not worth this self-sacrifice and certainly unable to fulfill our obligations for such a favor.
Oxymandias wrote:Dude, studies have shown that guys don't give a flying fuck about a chick's skin or even appearance. Guys are less selective than girls are.
Heisenberg wrote:As PoFo's leading RACE SCIENTIST™, I can confirm that Agent Steel is correct.
Oxymandias wrote:Guys have a natural inclination to accept any women, regardless of race.
Godstud wrote:They are doomed from the start, because they are weak, and insecure.
Godstud wrote:Ever heard of anal bleaching?
Godstud wrote:Yet often people are attracted to the very opposite of that. It's also very natural to want someone who does not have the same features as the group you are in. This prevents inbreeding.
Oxymandias wrote:On a more serious note, empirical evidence points to straight men not being selective towards difference females due to hormones as well as the dopamine which releases itself in your brain whenever a man sees any female regardless of skin color.
So how do you feel about political statements like, "All men are created equal... "?
There are general differences in size, bone density, etc. Sub-Saharan Africans have the highest genetic admixture of all humans, so it is very difficult to generalize them.
Africans, Caucasians and Asians. It's an old concept.
Still in college?
They are less selective, not non-selective. For example, I have blue eyes. I would prefer a woman with blue eyes. That doesn't mean I find brown eyes or green eyes hideous. It's just a Darwinian Sexual Selection preference.
This is obviously not true.
There are studies that suggest that people are less racist when they are on a non-selective beta blocker like Propranolol. This suggests that people have an adrenaline response when they see someone of another race.
Oxymandias wrote:I find it strange that you are generalizing all white peoples to be the same height, bone density, and thickness let alone every other race.
At all ages, African Americans have lower serum 25(OH)D concentrations than do whites. Clearly, factors other than vitamin D must provide protection against osteoporotic fractures in African Americans.
African Americans have a lower risk of hip fracture, as shown in the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) study. In this prospective study of 197 848 postmenopausal women, the 7784 black participants had one-half the prevalence of osteoporosis and one-half the fracture risk of whites (7). Hence, the paradox exists with low serum 25(OH)D concentrations and lower fracture risk.
Bone mass in African Americans is higher than in other populations. Studies at Brookhaven National Laboratory used radiographic absorptiometry and in vivo neutron activation analysis to show that bone mass in African American adults is ≈10–15% higher than in other populations throughout life (8, 9). More recent studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry have found similar results, and a study of trabecular bone sites showed an even higher advantage in African Americans (10–18).
Oxymandias wrote:I don't understand how genetic admixture has anything to do with skeletal structure.
Oxymandias wrote:It's an old concept for a reason given that it's false. This "African, Caucasian, and Asian" trinity is comparable to the outdated and disproved "Negroid, Caucasoid, and Mongoloid" trinity of the early 20th century. It has no place in modern political discussion.
Oxymandias wrote:On another note, I find it odd that self-proclaimed "white" people such as your self identify as Caucasian given that you and your descendants have probably never set foot in the lands surrounding the Caucasus.
Oxymandias wrote:Furthermore, I doubt you even look like a Caucasian or have any Caucasian genes in you.
Oxymandias wrote:Furthermore, Darwin's Sexual Selection can't be applied to actual human beings given that concepts such as beauty cannot exist in undeveloped organisms.
Oxymandias wrote:Therefore, by adopting Darwin's Sexual Selection as the reason why "white" people should or will favor other "whites", you are assuming that your own race is inferior and undeveloped.
Oxymandias wrote:You know what type of hormones I meant.
I didn't say all white people were the same height. Generally, Africans have higher bone density than whites, and this extends into late adulthood too.
The old racial joke is that black people all look the same. The scientific fact is that they are the most genetically diverse group of humans. Caucasians and Asians have much less genetic variation than sub-Saharan Africans.
It's not false. It's imprecise. As for political discussion, in countries like the United States that uphold free speech, everything is germane to a political discussion. That may not be true in thought control states like the United Kingdom or Germany. The United States as a general matter does track racial and ethnic statistics.
I identify as Nortern European genetically, and British Isles more specifically. "White" is an abstraction to include all Northern Europeans.
23andMe classifies me as 99.8% European with 78.3% British and Irish DNA, and 8.8% French and German. That's based upon reporting phenotypes, so it varies from site to site. However, it's generally a pretty good measure to characterize me as Anglo-Irish. I'm also 0.2% East Asian or Native American. These finer national-style distinctions don't really matter that much. For example, 23andMe shows me as 0% Scandinavian, but I'm also I1 Haplogroup. 40% of Scandinavian men are I1 Haplogroup as well. I have blue eyes. All people who have blue eyes share a common ancestor in the Black Sea area. Blue eyes have to be inherited from both parents. They are recessive to both brown and green eyes.
You assume the frontal cortex is running the show. I do not.
On the contrary, I'm assuming it's highly developed for a particular environment.
Rich wrote:I wasn't suggesting an affair. I was referring to Gorky's:
"Exterminate the homosexuals and you will end fascism".
This response was given effectively on behalf of Stalin. You seemed to be suggesting that extreme homophobia always implied closet homosexuality.
Oxymandias wrote:First off, it's African Americans.
Oxymandias wrote:Second, it's not detailing something that all African Americans have in their genes the minute they're born. It's something that is gained, not something inherent which means that whites can also attain the same features that African Americans have.
Oxymandias wrote:I had no idea someone could be so ignorant in regards to his own ethnic diversity. Europe is just as genetically diverse as Asia and Africa, it's just not portrayed as such due to the overarching narrative which permeates all the cultures of Europe.
Oxymandias wrote:Some ethnicities in Africa have no genetic similarities to one another outside of skin color. Aboriginal peoples have no genetic similarities to Ethiopians and both have no resemblances to the Songhai. Stop using geographical terms and assuming that they are "ethnicites" because it seems to be that you have no idea what race is.
Oxymandias wrote:Oh then I guess that 9/11 wasn't horrible, it was merely uncomfortable so it's perfectly fine.
Oxymandias wrote:You can't get any good policy decisions out of a stupid chauvinistic eugenic ideology from the early 20th century unless you want America to turn into a stupid eugenic ideology from the early 20th century in which case, I will enjoy your descendants squabble over who is "white" and slowly degrade into decadent incest as your exclusive, untruthful idea of "white-ness" slowly closes as your gene pool falters.
Oxymandias wrote:At least @Victoribus Spolia knew that revolving your civilization around a gene pool will result in it's destruction once that gene pool no longer can sustain itself so he admitted at least some form of cross-pollination, you refuse to accept such an idea at all.
Oxymandias wrote:You can't identify as something "genetically". You either have the genes or you don't, it's as simple as that.
Oxymandias wrote:Well since every rational decision we make is due to the frontal cortex and everything that differentiates us from animals is due to the frontal cortex then sure, yeah I think the frontal cortex is running the show. If the frontal cortex really wasn't running our subconscious, our dreams would certainly be more animalistic and less abstract, something that is characterized by the frontal cortex. Furthermore you wouldn't be able to debate with me if you didn't have a frontal cortex since it would be remarkably difficult for you to communicate not that it would matter given that you would be a bore to debate with anyways without a frontal cortex.
Oxymandias wrote: So Darwin himself says that sexual selection is something only to be observed in simple organisms and other scientists corroborate that claim yet you want to believe that it can be applied to us despite being completely different from animals.
I'm not a believer that evolution happens that fast. So presumably it is due to African roots.
It's more than likely genetic, and whites would not get it without some sort of genetic modification or selective breeding.
I'm not talking about ethnic diversity. I'm talking about genetic diversity. Asia and Europe are not as genetically diverse as Africa.
Again, I said nothing about ethnicities. You are essentially arguing with yourself at this point.
I'm not clear at all how you jump to that conclusion from a comment about political discussion.
Not that it matters much, but why do you think early 20th Century progressives were so stupid?
Our civilization is essentially being destroyed. What's your point?
Well, that's how 23andMe identifies me, and it is essentially correct.
We were talking about sexual preference, not rational discussion. I suppose you are going to tell me you consciously regulate your body temperature, heart rate and metabolism next.
Humans are animals. Darwin noted antlers. Deer are substantially more evolved than a heap of protoplasm.
Oxymandias wrote:If Humans are animals than they are horrible at being them. We constantly do things that animals will never do such as questioning our own existence, having complex social structures and being capable of questioning them, being able to be entertained and wanting to seek entertainment, seeking to learn about the world around us despite there being no biological reason to do so, seeking to educate our own children, and, if meditation is of any indication, being able to feel one with the world around us, a process that does not fully occur until death.
Oxymandias wrote:I have a cat. It's close enough.
Btw, aren't dogs more emotionally intelligent given that, through thousands of years of selective breeding, the most friendly and ergo, the most socially aware dogs were the most sought after?
I never said you're excluded from the world around you, simply that you are able to feel like a complete part of the world or, in other words, feel like the world, or in other words, experience the existence of everything around you.
being able to feel one with the world around us, a process that does not fully occur until death.
Oxymandias wrote:What defines a ethnicity is genes unless you are alluding that race is a social construct. Therefore, by talking about ethnic groups I am talking about genes. This is obvious in any discussion regarding the genes of other races.
An ethnic group, or an ethnicity, is a category of people who identify with each other based on similarities such as common ancestry, language, society, culture or nation. Ethnicity is usually an inherited status based on the society in which one lives. Membership of an ethnic group tends to be defined by a shared cultural heritage, ancestry, origin myth, history, homeland, language or dialect, symbolic systems such as religion, mythology and ritual, cuisine, dressing style, art, and physical appearance.
Oxymandias wrote:As I stated, ethnicity is genetic identity. You can't identify with a ethnic group because you have no power to do so. Your genes dictate your ethnic group regardless of what you define yourself as.
Oxymandias wrote:By stating the the Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid trinity is not false but imprecise, you are simply using a different word to mellow the flaws of the idea itself.
Oxymandias wrote:Therefore I used the word "uncomfortable" in order to mellow the impact of 9/11.
Oxymandias wrote:Your civilization will be destroyed because of your foolish ideas of ethnicity. No matter how much hoops white nationalists, racists, and "scientific realists" will jump through, no matter how much they try, they will never find a "white" ethnic group. The idea that a "pure" ethnicity even exists shows a lack of any understanding of basic genetics. In your attempt to shallowly define any superior race based on solely skin color you will find that you must create conditions where "black" skin color can never come to be and where "white" ethnic groups are dominant (which means avoiding any areas with extensive warmth and going to places with large amounts of coldness along with lots of snowfall). Then you must make sure that people only breed with other "whites" which, after 1,000 years will surely result in incest and in another 500 years will result in the retardation of the population.
Oxymandias wrote:White skin and blue eyes will never give you more intelligence, greater physical ability, or more power.
Oxymandias wrote:It will only make your heart the size of a peppercorn, your intestines rotten, your lungs eroded, hydrocephalus, a singe testicle as black as coal, and infertility.
Oxymandias wrote:23andMe never defined you as such. You simply traced the blue eye phenotype to the Black Sea and ran with it. Having blue eyes doesn't prove you are Caucasian just like how having an Indo-European language doesn't make you Indo-European.
Oxymandias wrote:This is about sexual preference. Your frontal cortex is the thing that allows you to appreciate and crave beauty at such a level that is nearly a basic biological function. Unless you would screw a healthy but fat, toothless, and old lady just because she has blue eyes. Animals, unlike humans, have no such distinctions.
Praise God! The suspense is ended. HalleluYah! :[…]
Interesting to see the human sewage that Obese Don[…]
Attempting to commit a crime is still a crime. Yo[…]
I view this as just more anti-Israel propaganda. […]