Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo Agora Mods
Christianity originated as a sect of Judaism, therefore the Christian God is the same God as the Jewish God.The latter does not follow from the former. At least from the point of view of theology, which is the subject of this thread, they are different. One being a trinity and the other not.
Potemkin wrote:Many Christian denominations do not believe in the concept of the Trinity. And besides, having a different interpretation of the same God is not equivalent to worshipping a different God.But the OP is specifically asking for the theological differences of the two concepts. Whether metaphysically you would consider them the same entity does not address that question. With respect to your first point it only becomes relevant if you become specific in your response to the OP then. The largest self-described Christian denominations, Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, most Protestants, profess a Trinity, and even the Mormons, which I think might be the largest self-described christian denomination, which depart significantly from the Nicene creed, profess a different concept of God than orthodox or reform Judaism. When answering the question of the OP then, it would be important to respond to that which the overwhelming majority of self-described christians believe in.
The most obvious difference though, is sacred art, and saint worship, providing a polytheist pantheon for Christianity.
Read Intercession of saints and patron saint.
There is some evidence of a Jewish belief in intercession, both in the form of the paternal blessings passed down from Abraham to his children, and 2 Maccabees, where Judas Maccabaeus sees the dead Onias and Jeremiah giving blessing to the Jewish army. There are also opposing views in that to God alone only prayers may be offered.
In modern times one of the greatest divisions in Jewish theology (hashkafa) is over the issue of whether one can beseech the help of a tzadik - an extremely righteous individual. The main conflict is over a practice of beseeching a tzadik who has already died to make intercession before the Almighty. This practice is common mainly among Chasidic Jews, but also found in varying degrees among other usually Chareidi communities. It strongest opposition is found largely among sectors of Modern Orthodox Judaism, Dor Daim and Talmide haRambam, and among aspects of the Litvish Chareidi community. Those who oppose this practice usually do so over the problem of idolatry, as Jewish Law strictly prohibits making use of a mediator (melitz) or agent (sarsur) between oneself and the Almighty.
The perspectives of those Jewish groups opposed to the use of intercessors is usually softer in regard to beseeching the Almighty alone merely in the "merit" (skhut) of a tzadik.
Those Jews who support the use of intercessors claim that their beseeching of the tzadik is not prayer or worship. The conflict between the groups is essentially over what constitutes prayer, worship, a mediator (melitz), and an agent (sarsur).
If you fail to see all these revered Saints in churches, you probably havent been to many churches, cause even Anglican churches have a load of icons.
I don't know about Cromwell, but i 've been to many Anglican churches in Cambridge, and there is an abundance of iconography, not found in synagogues. And that is a major difference between the 2. And any individual with a mere knowledge between the 2 is fully aware of.
WHY ARE ICONS SO NEW TO US IN THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH?
Following the Great Schism of 1054 C.E. the Western Church moved away from its previous liturgical practices and language because of the native languages spoken. Eventually, this part of the Church would adopt Latin as its universal liturgical language and the Italian Romance art forms took over from the stark, flat dimensional form used in Byzantine art. As the influence of Raphael's painting techniques took prominence in the early 16th Century C.E., followed [sic] by Giotto, da Vinci, Michaelangelo and others, the Western Church sought realism and beautiful, poetic pictures. Following the division of the Roman Catholic Church, in the 16th Century C.E. into principally the Roman, Lutheran and Church of England branches the Episcopal Church grew from that split. Consequently, the prevalent art forms were continued in America and wherever the Anglican communion was established. It is only in, perhaps, the last 20 years or so that Western Christianity has returned to its religious "roots" and became interested in the use of icons. The Episcopal Church in the United States has been in the vanguard of this renaissance of the use of icons, with Rome lagging somewhat behind. Yet many Episcopalians today continue to think of icons as being "Roman Catholic" and therefore unsuited to our Churches.
there is an abundance of iconography, not found in synagogues
Potemkin wrote:Do you actually read the links you post?
Potemkin wrote:The synagogue has not always been the centre of Judaism. The synagogue became significant only after the Diaspora, when rabbinical Judaism became dominant after the destruction of the Temple.
Read Intercession of saints and patron saint. If you fail to see all these revered Saints in churches, you probably havent been to many churches, cause even Anglican churches have a load of icons.
Jews reject the idea that Jesus was both the Messiah and God Himself
IIRC, we also went through that. And I recall I a[…]
- By Puffer Fish
I respect the hustle. But when it comes to FAFSA […]
'State of panic' as Putin realises he cannot wi[…]
- By wat0n
- By litwin