leo_tolstoy wrote:Mutualists because anarchists would draw negative attention to it and because it could possibly be a source of charitable funding for
cooperatives, communes and have its own credit union/s.
So you think substituting mutualists for anarchists will change the methodology use to establish a social agenda by any interpretation of civilizing/domesticating the human species to perform upon verbal command?
Going to create your own currency to be traded locally, federally, globally?
Now you talk about politics while establishing a church, what happened to separation of church and state, need separate institutions to define body and soul?
Between taxation and manditory donations what does the congregation get to keep from their own labor individually?
What happens to those individuals that change their minds and seek becoming another formed reality? Will they be considered anti-social behavioralists, traitors, blasphemists?
One borrows a belief for a FEE, a person can own a completely understanding of self nothing will ever change other than never being the same as before while here now FOR FREE. the simple requirement, constantly adapting or become extinct within a population of everyone acting the same way differently within a food chain limited to living in this atmosphere now.
Real is self evident, reality is a constantly changing hypothetical translation of where society needs to go next generation.
What is a generation? Each added lifetime or group of children from the same parents becoming parents themselves? What about the lifetimes that didn't reproduce their own heirs?
Perpetual energy is produced natually between expanding molecular combinations and contracting ancestral results as kinetically connected now universally here.