- 05 May 2017 09:40
#14802385
That makes no sense but OK.
For example, when she criticizes evolutionary psychology, it's pretty obvious that she's dealing in motivated reasoning. I personally object to some of the claims of evolutionary psychology as well, sometimes even vehemently, but THASS SEXISSISS isn't a valid criticism.
Pants-of-dog wrote:So you are indulging in the same behaviour you condemn, as far as I can see.
That makes no sense but OK.
Pants-of-dog wrote:How is Ms. Watson not really a skeptic? Is the mere mention of sexual assault enough to make you a fraud in the atheist movement?
For example, when she criticizes evolutionary psychology, it's pretty obvious that she's dealing in motivated reasoning. I personally object to some of the claims of evolutionary psychology as well, sometimes even vehemently, but THASS SEXISSISS isn't a valid criticism.