On the dumb points being posted on Islam. A few clarifications needed.
1-On sects, its preferable to identify which sect is being discussed. Since the Hadith you're mumbling about isn't shared by all sects. There are 6 sources of hadith in Sunni Islam, with several schools of thought and sects in Sunni Islam each taking 1 or more of those sources and ignoring the others.
No Sunni sect takes all 6 of them exists. And the material in those sources range from varying to outright contradicting each other in many points.
In Shia Islam, its even further divided since there are 12 sources with 4 schools of thought and over 30 different sects each having to some extent their own religion sharing some similarities with some sects and being the complete opposite of others.
Then there are the Quranist sects which don't recognize any hadith to begin with and have their own interpretations.
Furthermore there are some offshoots of Islam who have different versions of the Quran it self and even further sources of hadith different from the others, like the most known of them currently the Alawites.
Then there are the 7 readings of the Quran which each results in a different meaning of the Quran before even going to the Ijtihad and Qiyas part. This ,by the way, is the main reason there are sects in Islam and not, as some believe, the disagreement over the caliphate after Mohammad's death.
2- When talking about the so-called "shaira law". As mentioned before, Sharia means laws. The more accurate and factual name would be Islamic Sharia translating into Islamic law.
In this point, which version of Islamic laws are you talking about ?
3- In regard to the even more bullshit-filled point of "Islamic ideology". Islam is and has a spectrum of ideologies as anyone who ever held a book about it would know. In this point, which Islamic ideology are you addressing ?
4- When discussing the acclaimed human rights violations, there are 50 Muslim states in the world and within them there are over 200 different Muslim nations. Which one are you talking about ?
In the points stated as facts from the know-nothing team in here. Here are some highlights.
the only interpretation of Islam that matters is that of the prophet Mohammad.
There is no such thing, since everyone is trying to 1- know what exactly did mohammad say, and 2- what does it mean. The disagreements as shown earlier are quite extensive.
To elaborate on her point you personally can never read the Quran or the Hadith and then imagine that because that nice lady in the burka next door has not yet exploded or tried to kill you that in your own imagination you can interpret Islam as the most peaceful of religions, better even than Buddhism, but that interpretation doesn't matter because real muslims are reading the Quran and the Hadith and coming to completely different conclusions about what Mohammad wants them to do.
1- If every Muslim is gonna suddenly "blow up and kill everyone around them", humans would go extinct.
2- Reading the Quran alone actually can produce some of the most peaceful sects in the Islamic world.
Quranist sects, which don't recognize any hadith and stick to the Quran, are the most neutral ones out there and don't part-take in any conflict. In fact, as far as 'm aware, there was never in history a conflict the included any Quranist sect. Mainly because the Quran on it self clearly states that Muslims shouldn't try to enforce or expand their religion, and permits only defensive wars. It does talk alot about prophecies and how punishments work are in the afterlife, but not extensively on this one.
Anyone who actually bothers to read the full context of each verse would know this, though I'm sure most don't have sufficient mental capacity to read full texts.
sooner or later they will pick up their own books and see your interpretation is fake.
They did, turns out the results are not what you think they are.
Let them kill one another, in a decade or 2, a invasion wont be even necessary, half will be dead anyway
1400 years, overwhelming majority of it without any foreign presence, and it seems Muslims are still alive and growing bigger in number.
Shocker, I know.
Rejecting Islam is based on rational ideas, facts that are easily proved.
Demonstrated clearly by you proving them.
Intelligent and rational people discuss ideas, phobic and irrational people are attached to ideologies.
Exactly.
Intelligent and rational people discuss ideas, something which you've not done.
Phobic and irrational people are attached to ideologies. Considering the an ideology is a set of beliefs a person holds in its raw definition, you're attached to an ideology and in general rejecting facts or any discussion of ideas.