Oxy and Dave, you both sound like liberal socialists.
Oxymoron wrote:There is a lot of fraud going on by employers to create a "need" for foriegn workers who are conviently cheaper then local candidates. In my new field for example firms actually create fake jobs, with extremely low pay (by industry standards) when no one bites they go to the goverment and request J-1 Visas for their Indian compatriots who they bring over and basically use them as slave labour and reap huge profits from their work. This is not unique to IT.
The problem isn't immigrants at all. The problem you have is with capitalism itself. If you provide jobs that are low paying and people will still take these jobs, then obviously, there was still a demand for such levels of pay. Just because you don't like the pay, doesn't mean you have to complain about foreign people. The companies are providing such paying jobs and whether or not you take it, has no connection to whether a foreign person exist in the country. The company is only attempting to be competitive within the market to provide low prices to consumers and high profits for share holders.
Dave wrote:Wages have been declining in the United States for over 30 years, about 15 million people are officially unemployed, and more than one in four of men aged 16 to 64 not in school are not employed. Labor shortage my ass.
In regard to wages, what does that matter? The wage is part of the
cost side of producing a commodity/service. The lower the cost side of your spreadsheet, the better, as you gain profits and provide for consumer demands. As for the unemployed, this is an issue with capitalism again. The government doesn't tell others who they should employ. This isn't the Soviet Union, where you are given a job by the government. There are plenty of jobs available in the United States. Just because you don't like the pay, doesn't mean it's fair to complain about foreigners. I find it strange that people say there are no jobs out there, but everywhere on the interest, when you go to job searches, there are a LOT of jobs that many people could perform.
Dave wrote:Fair enough. The conservative and nationalistic Japanese would also probably respond well to a "babies for the fatherland" campaign. The present Japanese (people, not government) view on depopulation seems to be that Japan is too crowded and that a little shrinking would be nice.
Don't be so naive. Back in the 1950's and 60's, you found a lot of Japanese working for long hours and having very few moments to see their family. Although this idea still exists, a lot of younger people in Japan hate having to work these long hours and want more free time for themselves. The long hours worked by these employees in the past, helped develop Japan in to the second largest economy. Add to this the reduction in population, this doesn't bode well for continued economic success. They need more children, but the current structure of Japanese economy isn't very flexible for having a lot of children, especially since the cost of living is rising in Japan (need for a second income) and the lack of family connection. The last thing Japan needs is less people in the country, since it would lose a LOT in terms of its economy. The environment now is not good for encouraging population growth or economic growth. They really should encourage paid maternity leave (for all women), job security and accessible child care programs (for example, a number of the very large companies who hire women, have child care programs in the same building that the women work. Then at the end of the day, the women can pick up their children without problems or worries about leaving early.
It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness. - Karl Marx