- 06 Jun 2019 16:47
#15010380
He wouldn't have a father's obligation if he wasn't the father, obviously. What is wrong with you?
![Image](https://image.ibb.co/cy3G88/commiekhorne2.png)
The solution to 1984 is 1973!
Pants-of-dog wrote:That is true.
Anyway, it seems illogical to assume that a father’s obligations to a child have anything to do with a woman’s sexual past. Is there any logic to that?
He wouldn't have a father's obligation if he wasn't the father, obviously. What is wrong with you?
![Image](https://image.ibb.co/cy3G88/commiekhorne2.png)
The solution to 1984 is 1973!