So what is the common between Anglo-Saxons, Irish, Scottish and French? They don't share one language. They don't share one religion. They don't share the same history. What else except race?
Just ignoring the fact that language, religion, and history are French words derived from Latin, brought to England by Norman invasion. I'm not going to even speak about the other European nationalities. You need to read a history book. I'm shocked by your ignorance, this is what I mean, people come here and they have no clue about European civilization.
So how do you think they should be treated? Should they still be considered part of your Anglo-Saxons/Irish/Scottish/French culture?
Yes I think they are still of the same culture group. As there are Protestant Germans and Catholic Germans, it changes some aspect of that cultural group but I think very little.
If yes, then what is your definition of a culture?
Now that is a good question; I think a better term would be to use ethnicity instead of culture. Culture/Ethnicity to me means that an individual has for one familiar physical characteristics, ways of behavior, similar mentality. Preset, I think genetically and cultivated by parenting and up brining. These behaviors, physical characteristics, and mentality was influenced by time, thus why we have different ethnicities/cultures. I notice more and more that there are differences between ethnicities/culture and sometimes there are very vivid. I’m thinking of a good example I will post it to you once I formulated it well.
What do you think is closer to "your culture", a Muslim Anglo-Saxon or a Christian Latino?
Term Latino is a very broad concept, but what I think you mean here is a Native American/Aborigine of South America, and an English person. I think an Anglo-Saxon man/woman would be closer to me then a Latino in this situation.
I do have very close friends from different cultures. My closest friend here in Canada was a Chinese and atheist.
I had friend from many culture groups as well; However, with age you will begin to notice that people of different ethnicities wither away and the only one that are left around you are people that are ethnically closest to you.
If all Anglo-Saxons don't want to mix with other people as you are trying to say, then they shouldn't have left Europe to mix with native American at the first place.
If one must look in the present, then you should recognize that Canadian immigrants from Asia, India and the ME are now natives, besides Europeans and of course Aboriginals.
Why do you type this non-sense what are you trying to achieve with it? This is on the same level as me typing to you, “Well, why do you fly where you came from and start a multicultural society there”. Also, there is anopther thing I could say on your level of thinking. "Let us look at the present then, and live like “natives”. “If you open up a history book and you eyes, you will realize that Europeans never did mix in large numbers with the natives, and one lived separately from one another, so why do you not pack up with your native ethnical group and live outside European settlements, why do you live in our cities, go build your own settlement, Europeans did. You learn in University that was established by Europeans, if you truly want to compare this situation, presently in history, with that of 15th century and 19th , then proceed, resettle, then we will compare." Ignoramus.