- 03 Jun 2009 04:14
#13051029
Anarcho-Capitalist?
At this point I'm not arguing with you, just explaining this person's justification. Acording to him, When the Government runs the justice system, it is too easily corrupted. When I asked the obvious question, I found out the hard way how highly he thought of me. This was a site with a Reputation system, by the way. I stopped talking to this guy at that point.
This guy has actually run for pres 3 times. He got like 10 votes each time. Never vote for the Kaith Party, by the way.
I, again, am only explaining his rationale. To this guy, the military should be funded by donation ( ), and otherwise just be a Militia. To him, the government running the military makes it too easy for the government to take action against it's own people, or wage wars for economic means. Whatever.
I understand. I was talking about these guys having ideas that are similar to Libertarian ideas (National Government with seriously limited power). I still am not sure I understand how there could be an Anarchist who wants a National Government, even if that government isn't maintaining roads or running the military. The guy compaining about the Justice system I agree, but the other two I don't get. I geuss I'm just an idiot :shrugg:
AnCaps (a sub-species of Anarchists)
Anarcho-Capitalist?
If that one says government should not be in charge of the cops, that one is not a Libertarian/Minarchist/Classical Liberal
At this point I'm not arguing with you, just explaining this person's justification. Acording to him, When the Government runs the justice system, it is too easily corrupted. When I asked the obvious question, I found out the hard way how highly he thought of me. This was a site with a Reputation system, by the way. I stopped talking to this guy at that point.
Well, this guy might be a Libertarian (in the sense of a member of the American Libertarian Party, for example)
This guy has actually run for pres 3 times. He got like 10 votes each time. Never vote for the Kaith Party, by the way.
Again, by definition, this third person cannot be a Libertarian/Minarchist/Classical Liberal, even if he insists upon calling himself one.
I, again, am only explaining his rationale. To this guy, the military should be funded by donation ( ), and otherwise just be a Militia. To him, the government running the military makes it too easy for the government to take action against it's own people, or wage wars for economic means. Whatever.
Can you not grasp the fundamental difference between a philosophy which states that government (albeit strictly limited government) is an essential component of a society and a philosophy which states that government is forbidden to society?
I understand. I was talking about these guys having ideas that are similar to Libertarian ideas (National Government with seriously limited power). I still am not sure I understand how there could be an Anarchist who wants a National Government, even if that government isn't maintaining roads or running the military. The guy compaining about the Justice system I agree, but the other two I don't get. I geuss I'm just an idiot :shrugg: