SolarCross wrote:The correct way to type "inow" is "know", it begins with a "k" not an "i", just so you know. Your conclusions are as warped as your typos. The fact is if two males get married then regardless of the age difference it is a same-sex marriage. The prophet mohammad famously married a 9 year old girl, but because she was a girl then whatever one may think about the age of his bride it is clear that is not a same-sex marriage. Are you clear on that point yet?
That depends on how you define marriage.
Are you now redefining marriage to mean a union between an adult and a child?
Mike did. It's a pretty common fallacy employed by "progressives" and it is riff on the whig theory of history.
No, he expressed the desire for you lot to be forcibly included in the modern paradigm that same sex marriage is not a big deal.
Fine so you agree with me on this.
If you are claiming that the whole " society is progressing to some ideal point" is just a myth that conservatives made up to lampoon the progressive position, then yes.
The customs differ from time and place, though not so much as all that sometimes for example gold wedding rings worn on the 3rd finger from the thumb on the left hand is a tradition which originated in ancient Rome and people still do that. The purpose remains the same.
Oh, you are pretending that all marriages are for the same reason. The property exchanges of ancient Rome are qualitatively the same as the marriage I currently enjoy, despite the extreme difference in laws and objectives between ancient Rome and the indigenous culture in which my marriage occurs.
Because of lions and penises.
Nero didn't get married to a boy for any rational reason, he was insane actually. Although sodomy was tolerated in ancient rome no one except crazy people like Nero felt the need to perform the rites of matrimony with the same sex because there is on rational reason to do so.
So not only did you deliberately confuse homosexuality and pedophilia, and make an argument from ignorance, but you are also attempting to associate same sex marriage with insanity.
It is like you are deliberately trying to make the worst possible argument against same sex marriage.