Page 2 of 2
PostPosted:08 May 2009 12:08
by canadiancapitalist
haha really? that's funny.
PostPosted:10 May 2009 01:28
by Suska
the ideology of the party leader is irrelevant since there is no block voting, i vote for myself as you do, therefore if we do have a leader they are basically volunteering to represent the Caucus to the Parliament, they do not decide for the Caucus. The Caucus is our own private debate club basically, with a somewhat fixed topic. The leader ought to remind everyone when a vote is coming and keep up with the goings on, but we all should really stay active on these matters in as much as the Parliament interests us. If it isn't interesting - so really it is gonna come down to who ever actually runs with the ball. It isn't as though I'm doing much anyways - I'd take the title "Club Secretary" but I'd also let RPA have it; he doesn't want it, so whatever.
Youre right btw, as a crude average I am probably a little left of you, and still at a Federal level I'd push as far right as possible. I want politics to happen within a personal range or basically not at all. The president is commander in chief not emperor, the armed forces is a defense force, not god's mercenaries. etc.
PostPosted:11 May 2009 16:45
by canadiancapitalist
We need to expand our voting block. Can I bring real life or online friends into this game? None of them would probably want to play anyway. Is that cheating?
PostPosted:11 May 2009 21:28
by RonPaulalways
They need to have registered with PoFo before the PoFo parliament was created in order to be allowed to vote, so no, that's not possible. It may be good to get them to register now though, in case future PoFo parliaments have different participation requirements.
PostPosted:11 May 2009 22:58
by canadiancapitalist
What a discriminatory limit on suffrage! For shame!
PostPosted:30 May 2009 08:21
by RonPaulalways
PostPosted:22 Jun 2009 21:23
by Hot Choco
Hello everyone!
Allow me to join you.
PostPosted:23 Jun 2009 05:10
by RonPaulalways
Welcome!
PostPosted:05 Jul 2009 01:20
by JohnRawls
I would like to join LC also .
PostPosted:05 Jul 2009 01:40
by Sephardi
Are you guys there?
Why is the LC inactive? You guys got a seat in Parliament...
Oh well. Elections are July 12th and you guys need to sign up or you'll be exempt. I guess RPA is not playing this game anymore.
PostPosted:05 Jul 2009 03:10
by Vladimir
He's too busy being his libertarian self here
viewtopic.php?f=12&p=13083012#p13083012
PostPosted:05 Jul 2009 06:01
by RonPaulalways
Guys, only LC members can post here.
PostPosted:05 Jul 2009 06:39
by Michaeluj
Ugh, sorry that I've forgone this parliament. Could you give me the 411?
PostPosted:05 Jul 2009 06:48
by RonPaulalways
JohnRawls wrote:I would like to join LC also.
Welcome!
Ugh, sorry that I've forgone this parliament. Could you give me the 411?
Yeah I haven't been keeping track either since we lost the majority to the left.
PostPosted:05 Jul 2009 17:00
by Sephardi
Welcome!
He's mine.
Anyways, you rich fat cats better fund my paramilitary organization, the NGFP (Nationalist Guerrilla Forces of Pofo).
PostPosted:06 Jul 2009 03:16
by Holt
Electoral Act 2009 wrote:a) Subject to subsection (b), an elector enrolled for an electorate is entitled to vote at an election for the electorate.
b) A person who is enrolled is not entitled to vote at an election unless he or she will;
i. have more than 100 posts
ii. They have been a member of the PoliticsForum for a period of at least one month.
PostPosted:06 Jul 2009 04:10
by Suska
.
Gentlemen I'd like to make several motions
1. Will the SN-RF Coalition MP please be escorted out of the chambers, and as Demosthenes put it, "This thread is for internal discussion only. All other posts shall be deleted. Please respect this party's personal privacy." - the remark be stricken.
2.Is the Caucus in agreement with the platform? I motion that the Gentlemen declare there Ayes and Nays in this regard. Feel free at this point to explain Nays.
3.I motion furthermore, not contingent, unrelated to the previous motions, that the Liberty Caucus disassociate itself with the other Parliamentary bodies by either a) establishing an independent government within the imagined PofoLand. or b) pursuing a coalition with other parties to reestablish the Parliamentary movement as a hypothetical body governing RL America.
PostPosted:06 Jul 2009 06:20
by MB.
holt wrote:i. have more than 100 posts
Holt is quite right.
PostPosted:06 Jul 2009 07:03
by RonPaulalways
Suska wrote:2.Is the Caucus in agreement with the platform? I motion that the Gentlemen declare there Ayes and Nays in this regard. Feel free at this point to explain Nays.
Aye (obviously).
3.I motion furthermore, not contingent, unrelated to the previous motions, that the Liberty Caucus disassociate itself with the other Parliamentary bodies by either a) establishing an independent government within the imagined PofoLand. or b) pursuing a coalition with other parties to reestablish the Parliamentary movement as a hypothetical body governing RL America.
I'm open to discussing both these options more. I like the idea, if other LCers are open to it.
PostPosted:06 Jul 2009 15:54
by Suska
Pursuant to my first motion; Will the Right Venerable Gentleman from the Communist Party please be escorted out and beaten with a stick, as the Right Venerable Gentleman himself said in his own sessions, "What are you even doing, posting in this thread, MB? Are you a member of the Liberty Caucus? I didn't think so." - and his remark be stricken. paragraph (b) of this motion, can we have armed guards posted at the chamber's entrance?