PoFo Parliament - Page 26 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

This is a the archive of the "PoFo Parliament". A user-run project.
Forum rules: This is a the archive of the "PoFo Parliament". A user-run project.
User avatar
By dilpill
#1864164
Again though, you can't prevent dupe accounts or "newly registered users" from skewing the vote...

For the first time, we could limit voting to users who registered before today, so that people couldn't create new voting accounts on the day of the election.

However, I don't think that dupe accounts would be that much of a problem, since having multiple accounts at one IP address is a bannable offense.

We should just go with the suggestion you said earlier:
When the parties are as organized as they can be we shoudl request a special poll (including an "other" for write-ins) that can be moved to this forum once the alloted voting period ends.

It would be so much simpler.

Also, the password and outside website idea wouldn't be fool proof either. People could just register multiple accounts here, and request multiple passwords to get multiple votes. :hmm:
User avatar
By Demosthenes
#1864171
dilpill wrote:It would be so much simpler


Probably true.

dilpill wrote:Also, the password and outside website idea wouldn't be fool proof either. People could just register multiple accounts here, and request multiple passwords to get multiple votes.


True, but if you have a "Parlimentary Administrator" assigning those passwords he/she could filter as need be.

Edit- Ivan has bandwidth he's said is just sitting there, it's not that difficult to either ask him to do it, or ask him to provide someone access who can.
User avatar
By Potemkin
#1864178
*ingliz upholsters his pistol and places it on the table, scratches his head and jokes*

Its a good job we were all too busy with this election to phone the enbalmers

*Guffaws all round, Comradely hugs. much vodka and back to business*

Aw gee, ingliz, you're such a kidder! Ain't he a kidder, guys! *punches ingliz playfully on the shoulder*

*makes mental note to have ingliz purged*
By Clausewitz
#1864195
For fun, the current results:

Code: Select all           votes   share   seats       
POP           27   14.1%      14       
PNL           31   16.2%      16       
CA            21   11.0%      11       
LC             7    3.7%       4    (3)
PUC           22   11.5%      12       
SLDs          23   12.0%      12       
SN            23   12.0%      12       
RF            37   19.4%      19   (20)
Turnout      191                       

Coalition          Seats                           
Red                   43             (RF, SN, SLDs)
Center-left           36            (PUC, SLDs, SN)
Social Democrat       24                 (SLDs, SN)
Grand (SN)          * 51    (CA, LC, PUC, SLDs, SN)
Grand                 39        (PUC, CA, LC, SLDs)
Grand (PNL)         * 55   (PNL, CA, LC, PUC, SLDs)
Center-right          27              (PUC, CA, LC)
Black and blue      * 57    (POP, PNL, CA, LC, PUC)
Conservative          31              (PNL, CA, LC)
Far right             41             (POP, PNL, CA)

* 100 seats are apportioned according to the Sainte-Lague method.
  When the D'Hondt result differs from the Sainte-Lague result, the D'Hondt result is given in parentheses
  Coalitions with a * have more than 50 seats between them.


I think we should just see if we can get an opinion poll up.

It might also be fun to play with a screwed up parliament for a bit, even if the election was horribly flawed. It'd add to the drama. :muha1:
Last edited by Clausewitz on 09 Apr 2009 23:06, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Nets
#1864201
Clausewitz, Fasces rigged the ballots these results don't count.
By Clausewitz
#1864202
Yeah, I know, I just thought it'd be interesting to look.
User avatar
By Fasces
#1864225
Of course, the results for the PNL and the RF were not the product of fraud.

I know perfectly well that RF was rigging ballots! :lol:
Last edited by Fasces on 10 Apr 2009 00:19, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Cheesecake_Marmalade
#1864286
The PNL's results were not the product of fraud. There was no ballot stuffing from us.
User avatar
By Doomhammer
#1864355
One would expect commies and fascists to rig elections... behold. :lol:
User avatar
By Fasces
#1864360
It is all a leftist trick. They stuffed the polls with our ballots to undermine our credibility.
User avatar
By Nets
#1864365
Oh, stuff it.
User avatar
By Doomhammer
#1864368
Oh, stuff it.

They already have. :D
User avatar
By Red Star
#1864409
Image

*takes to the floor of Parliament*

Such slanders cannot stand - I doubt anarchists would be stuffing ballots in those boxes! This should be seen as the PoFo people's cry of protest, and no amount of name calling by the black-shirts will change that!

*fires a couple of rounds into the ceiling*
User avatar
By Brio
#1864454
Fasces wrote:*fires a couple of rounds into the anarchist*


Hasn't there already been enough bloodshed today? I mean I'm still quite injured from my last venture into Pofo Parliament. ;)
User avatar
By Rancid
#1868394
Alright, put me down for the Liberty Caucus.

though i find the revolution front interesting...
  • 1
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26

They do not have equality of opportunity compared […]

BRICS will fail

BRICS involves one of several configurations emplo[…]

So you do justify October 7, but as I said lack th[…]

Were the guys in the video supporting or opposing […]