- 12 Dec 2016 18:50
#14748853
No, that's an anti-scientific Marxist name. A scientific classification of producers would be based on whether they contribute to production, not whether they are employed by someone else or employ someone else.
No, that's an anti-scientific Marxist name. A scientific classification of parasites would be based on whether they make a contribution to production commensurate with the share of production they receive, not simply whether they own something that is used for production, ignoring whether what they own is something they have contributed and would not exist otherwise, or something that existed anyway, without their help, and to which they have simply received a title from government that enables them to take from production without contributing to production.
Decky wrote:The scientific name for the producing class is the Proletariat,
No, that's an anti-scientific Marxist name. A scientific classification of producers would be based on whether they contribute to production, not whether they are employed by someone else or employ someone else.
the scientific name for parasitises is the bourgeoisie.
No, that's an anti-scientific Marxist name. A scientific classification of parasites would be based on whether they make a contribution to production commensurate with the share of production they receive, not simply whether they own something that is used for production, ignoring whether what they own is something they have contributed and would not exist otherwise, or something that existed anyway, without their help, and to which they have simply received a title from government that enables them to take from production without contributing to production.
- By skinster
- By FiveofSwords
- By Tainari88