- 01 Jan 2021 15:46
#15145842
This is just right-wing alarmism / reaction -- you suddenly snap at the idea of government spending when it comes to *left-wing*, and *workers'* interests, and benefits.
Which is more important, *providing* food, or *profiting* from food -- ?
Housing, or the real estate market?
BeesKnee5 wrote:
UBS (Universal basic services). The aim being to reduce the cost of living rather than raise the amount of money paid out, in this regard it is anti-inflationary and so the money spent by the state isnt devalued and doesn't devalue the income of existing workers (Although it does devalue capital, which is no bad thing).
Puffer Fish wrote:
Not really, since those people doing the services still have to be paid.
I think your logic on this point is off.
Unless you are talking about recouping the costs through higher taxes.
This is just right-wing alarmism / reaction -- you suddenly snap at the idea of government spending when it comes to *left-wing*, and *workers'* interests, and benefits.
Which is more important, *providing* food, or *profiting* from food -- ?
Housing, or the real estate market?