[Thomasmariel]

Would Brad Pitt need a bald head, to beat Yul Brynner in a fight?

[Thomasmariel]

Would the Socratic method be disproven, if all people on Earth were seen reading bedtime stories?

[Thomasmariel]

If the same Guardian newspaper article is read by everyone, would this make chemistry impossible?

[Thomasmariel]

Can nationalism let socialism destroy the US, so that all sounds and noises can have children?

[Thomasmariel]

If capitalism needs war, who is meant to live so that they can have opinions?

[Thomasmariel]

When people get airstriked, do movie opinions matter?

[Thomasmariel]

If absence doesn't need to overcome a castle, is it a betrayal of absence if this benefits absence?



(This might be the most important question I've ever asked on this forum)

[Oxymandias]

@Thomasmariel

Now Thomas you know that's a loaded question. The reason why no one asks this question is because it's very very controversial in modern day political thought.

The notion of whom absence really is by itself is quite debatable. For example, is the each of the three absences used here in this question the same entity or different ones with different definitions? And if they are different entities which entities are they? If they are the same entities, is the question referring to the consciousness of absence itself? Through Object Oriented Philosophy we are capable of not just applying a certain level of consciousness to objects but concepts as well therefore it is possible to apply this level of consciousness to absence.

But then we must ask, is this really the nature of consciousness that absence contains? Is this question really feasible given the lack of information we have of the concept of absence. Absence is an idea and therefore we are unable to apply any form of absence but of our own. In my opinion there are different levels of absence as a concept. Absence to be found within an individual, absence within a group, absence with in a crowd, and absence within a population. Each have different properties which fit between each level and there are several of the same levels with different properties of absence as well.

Ergo, this question must be rephrased as it is too vague. Which level of absence are you referring to? Are the three entities exhibited within the question the same or different? Is the founding philosophy of your question Object-Oriented or Networkologistic or something else entirely? Does your question consider Dark Vitalism? All these questions contribute to the controversy surrounding it.

[Thomasmariel]

@Thomasmariel

Now Thomas you know that's a loaded question. The reason why no one asks this question is because it's very very controversial in modern day political thought.

The notion of whom absence really is by itself is quite debatable. For example, is the each of the three absences used here in this question the same entity or different ones with different definitions? And if they are different entities which entities are they? If they are the same entities, is the question referring to the consciousness of absence itself? Through Object Oriented Philosophy we are capable of not just applying a certain level of consciousness to objects but concepts as well therefore it is possible to apply this level of consciousness to absence.

But then we must ask, is this really the nature of consciousness that absence contains? Is this question really feasible given the lack of information we have of the concept of absence. Absence is an idea and therefore we are unable to apply any form of absence but of our own. In my opinion there are different levels of absence as a concept. Absence to be found within an individual, absence within a group, absence with in a crowd, and absence within a population. Each have different properties which fit between each level and there are several of the same levels with different properties of absence as well.

Ergo, this question must be rephrased as it is too vague. Which level of absence are you referring to? Are the three entities exhibited within the question the same or different? Is the founding philosophy of your question Object-Oriented or Networkologistic or something else entirely? Does your question consider Dark Vitalism? All these questions contribute to the controversy surrounding it.

The absence I mean is the one that has no elsewhere

[Oxymandias]

@Thomasmariel

That itself is also too vague. Each concept has a different form in each individual person's consciousness. If two or more consciousnesses think about the same concept (often communicated through abstract or vague structures such as language or visual mediums) a new concept will arise out of the similarities between each of those consciousnesses mental illustration of the two individual concepts. This is done through the simple act of two or more people communicating to one another about the concept creating a sort of shared understanding. That shared understanding is this new level of concept.

As of right now you have an individual thought and I have an interpretation of that individual thought. These two thoughts are beings of their own that each have their own consciousness. They may be different, incomprehensible consciousnesses but they are consciousnesses nonetheless. In order to produce a new, higher-order thought we must clarify and discuss with the limited amount of tools we have.

[Thomasmariel]

Should all White House staff jump up and down to the John Williams Superman theme, at the same time?

[Thomasmariel]

If all Americans create YouTube videos that praise US conservatism, would this end the US economy?

[Thomasmariel]

Were the business affairs of Walmart the identity of January 6th 2018?

[Thomasmariel]

If Iranians and Americans can mock other Americans, why do Iranians go through US border checks?

[Oxymandias]

@Thomasmariel

Because they can't tell the difference between an Iranian and a German. Both proclaim themselves as Aryan so Americans need both to go through border checks to make sure neither race is committing identity fraud.

[Oxymandias]

@Thomasmariel

Idk but it will summon the Anti-Christ.

[Thomasmariel]

@Thomasmariel

Because they can't tell the difference between an Iranian and a German. Both proclaim themselves as Aryan so Americans need both to go through border checks to make sure neither race is committing identity fraud.

What if the race in question isn't Iranian but is British?

[Oxymandias]

Yes. It will solve all of America's problems.

[Thomasmariel]

@Thomasmariel

Idk but it will summon the Anti-Christ.

When I use YouTube nowadays, based on the videos that I see it's as though it's become very popular to ridicule equality and anti-discrimination (especially in relation to the movie industry)

[Oxymandias]

@Thomasmariel

The British aren't allowed into the country as they are well-known for committing identity fraud. They claim to be Anglo-Saxons but are actually Germans wearing Irish masks for some reason.