- 06 Jun 2007 03:10
#1228778
Europe obviously does have strategic interest: if for no other reason then because unlike the US it is within easy reach by sea and by land. And besause after they destroy their natural habitats and - as some expect - "(700 millions now, above a billion in the future)more more and more people will go in the cities creating huge megapolis ravaged by poverty,disease and civil war", many will not stay in that unpleasant place but will try to break into European countries. If there is a massive tide of migration in millions, Europe will be simply overrun.
Kind of weird of "us" in the west to always say others much be carefull with their enviroment, afther we in europe cut down almost all our forrestsWeird or not, although we maight have destroyed a fair shair of natural habitats in the past - but it is a matter of fact today we (the developed countries) are the only pleople who are at all seriously concerned with saving the habitats, humanity's common treasure, for future generations of humans of all races - including the descendants of today's developing word's populations of course. It has nothing to do with who did what in the past: it is about who can do what today and in the future.