- 12 Sep 2007 23:02
#1323831
So if a neo-nazi is harassed by a Jew, its 'not that bad' if the neo-nazi kills the Jew?
This is line of thinking should be tossed in garbage bin, along with the notion that race crimes are worse than similar 'normal' crimes, etc.
'Complete' stories don't exist. No one can have all the facts. But I will re-iterate again that I wasn't so concerned about this particular case, but views on leniency in justice systems. You seem to have spun it into some conspiracy theory.
So its ok if individuals use threats and violence?
So if the police are not able to pin crimes on the perpetrators before the crimes even occur, the perpetrators should be treated leniently after the crimes?
Why would it matter? They committed murder. Whether they were pillars of society or drug dealers shouldn't make a difference in the sentencing. But I did mention the sentenced man had a prior 5 year sentence. I don't know for what, but I'm assuming he wasn't a pillar of society.
If a Nazi sympathizer camps outside the home of a common Jew and raises tirades for years upon years until the resident finally slays the beast on the streets out of rage than I will not empathize with the dead and harass the resident toward prison.
So if a neo-nazi is harassed by a Jew, its 'not that bad' if the neo-nazi kills the Jew?
This is line of thinking should be tossed in garbage bin, along with the notion that race crimes are worse than similar 'normal' crimes, etc.
This is not a complete story!
'Complete' stories don't exist. No one can have all the facts. But I will re-iterate again that I wasn't so concerned about this particular case, but views on leniency in justice systems. You seem to have spun it into some conspiracy theory.
a bank should not hold its loans with threats. But what power did they have?
So its ok if individuals use threats and violence?
but the police do not crack down on them as frequently as provincially beneficial. And so, to punish them only after an action is to foolishly encourage them
So if the police are not able to pin crimes on the perpetrators before the crimes even occur, the perpetrators should be treated leniently after the crimes?
Here you have an issue where I do not know whether the killers are "scum" or not.
Why would it matter? They committed murder. Whether they were pillars of society or drug dealers shouldn't make a difference in the sentencing. But I did mention the sentenced man had a prior 5 year sentence. I don't know for what, but I'm assuming he wasn't a pillar of society.