AK negligent discharge - Page 3 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Military vehicles, aircraft, ships, guns and other military equipment. Plus any general military discussions that don't belong elsewhere on the board.

Moderator: PoFo The Lounge Mods

By Chill
Wolfman wrote:You're correct that I was incorrect about the formula.

No I didn't mean you. Potemkin said I was incorrect because he thought I said humans were stronger than chimps but I didn't say that at all. :roll:

Also, I find relative strength not very meaningful in reality. As strong as an ant, I might kill it without even noticing.
By Wolfman
Weight to Strength Ratio has two normal applications:
1. In physics. It's important to know how strong two different materials are relative to their weights. If one is planning on building a building, it's good to know it wont collapse under it's own weight
2. In Exercise Science. This is more related to the issue about a chimp being strong enough to fire a rifle, but is more seen in application relating to strength comparisons between two athletes.

Comparing relative strength between an Ant and Human is way out there. Except maybe as a curious bit of information.
User avatar
By Thunderhawk
Weight to Strength Ratio

means smaller ratio = better.

Since most people generally think of bigger as better, the ratio is more often structured as a strength (or power) to weight ratio.

A to B = A/B
User avatar
By Demosthenes
You guys are arguing about gay shit. We have a video of a chimp firing an AK. It's cool even it's fake. Stop FUCKING IT UP!!

Talk about freaky revolutionary chimps OR GO BACK TO GORKIY YOU WHORES! :eek: :knife: :D

There is no evidence. So what we can say us that[…]


Both are true statements, which is why the second[…]

If you wish to narrowly define “disenfranchisemen[…]

Now reading

Lately I've been fascinated with this travel blog […]