- 04 Dec 2011 04:07
#13844558
Pants-of-Dog, if you've something you want to say, please say it. That is, unless you think your current method is working so well.
Now, onto Dr.Lee, the man who pretends to be a conservative:
Amazing. I present statistics from the CDC, and the reaction, instead of trying to disprove them, is to put the term statistics in quotes in an attempted slight against statistics in general.
Right. That's because 90%+ of the populace is not homosexual; when 90%+ of the populace, the heterosexual, represents (roughly) 1/2 of new HIV infections they are "under-represented" statistically. When 4% of the populace (queer men) represent 1/2 of new infections, they are over-represented.
Now, onto Dr.Lee, the man who pretends to be a conservative:
Your silly "statistic" is interesting in one regard.
Amazing. I present statistics from the CDC, and the reaction, instead of trying to disprove them, is to put the term statistics in quotes in an attempted slight against statistics in general.
You freely admit that 1/2 of the new HIV infections are NOT caused by homosexual behavior.
Right. That's because 90%+ of the populace is not homosexual; when 90%+ of the populace, the heterosexual, represents (roughly) 1/2 of new HIV infections they are "under-represented" statistically. When 4% of the populace (queer men) represent 1/2 of new infections, they are over-represented.