- 12 Jan 2008 04:14
#1423542
Does anybody agree with me that major political debates (as in those between prospective candidates for an office; for example the US presidential election) should happen in text?
In this medium things would be subject to more scrutiny, meaning that candidates would be harder-pressed to deflect away criticism without actually saying anything (which they love doing) and would be more likely to say things of substance; in addition the candidates could bring facts and studies to support their cases.
Something I've been thinking for a while.
In this medium things would be subject to more scrutiny, meaning that candidates would be harder-pressed to deflect away criticism without actually saying anything (which they love doing) and would be more likely to say things of substance; in addition the candidates could bring facts and studies to support their cases.
Something I've been thinking for a while.
Dave, Potemkin, Ombrageux: the three pillars of Western civilization. - Donald