- 26 Mar 2015 17:35
#14540701
Interested parties:
Americanroyalty
annatar1914 (Absolutely Corrupt)
Political Interest (Absolutely Corrupt)
Cromwell
Quetzalcoatl (99% Corrupt)
Frollein
Bridgeburner
Dystopian Darkness
ComradeTim
Goldberk (Absolutely Corrupt)
Brisket (Red Carded)
Far-Right Sage (Absolutely Corrupt)
...
Well, the various members of the SN-RF still engage with the "Socialism" and "Communism" sub-fora. Another thing, which has been highlighted, is that nationalism is not as narrow a form of political expression; it cuts across the spectrum.
Far-Right Sage said some good things, up-thread.
We might as well get organised, nevertheless.
Americanroyalty
annatar1914 (Absolutely Corrupt)
Political Interest (Absolutely Corrupt)
Cromwell
Quetzalcoatl (99% Corrupt)
Frollein
Bridgeburner
Dystopian Darkness
ComradeTim
Goldberk (Absolutely Corrupt)
Brisket (Red Carded)
Far-Right Sage (Absolutely Corrupt)
...
Dystopian Darkness wrote:Out of sheer curiosity - If we do create a nationalist group what would be the difference between arguing in a private space compared to a public one (me thinks sub-forums like "Paternalism & Corporatism" would suit nationalist debates pretty well)? Will we talk about how we are going to destroy liberalism and expose more extremist viewpoints?
Well, the various members of the SN-RF still engage with the "Socialism" and "Communism" sub-fora. Another thing, which has been highlighted, is that nationalism is not as narrow a form of political expression; it cuts across the spectrum.
Far-Right Sage said some good things, up-thread.
Quantum wrote:Anyway, Siberian Fox has been absent for a long time and any new clubs can't be approved until he returns.
We might as well get organised, nevertheless.