Igor Antunov wrote:As with all rebel opportunistic attacks they make headway due to surprise then meet resistance when SAA redeploys.
Yeah but that's not really great for the SAA now is it? It's why it's taking so long for them to clear the rebels in the first place, and once they commit to clearing them from a certain areas, other theatres suffer. The latest example of this is Aleppo - they invested so much into evicting the rebels from the Ramouseh corridor that the rebels gained considerable ground in Hama from which the government will now be evicting them for another few months at least. The Latakia front has also been mostly stalled for weeks if not months. Back when the SAA and allied militias went on that ill fated adventure towards Raqqa, and during the Tadmur offensive before that, they lost the strongholds of Al-Eis, Qarassi and Khan Touman that they had recaptured in south Aleppo when the Russians intervened, and Al Hadher is now on the frontlines again. It's very likely that the rebels will try to blitz it at some time, and given the pro-government Shia/Afghan militia record in south Aleppo, the chance of the rebels capturing it isn't that small. If they capture Al Hadher, the government gains of the grand south Aleppo offensive from last year will be reduced to a strip of minor villages, which is a terrible shame and advantage squandered for the government.
The only theatre that is consistently but slowly going in the government's favor is Rif Dimasq. Darayya could initiate a cascade of rebel-government deals in smaller besieged pockets. Muhammadiyah, a rebel pocket west of Darayya of similar size where a ceasefire has held for some time now, is also in the process of a negotiated rebel evacuation. There is talk about the same being prepared in Madaya and the nearby rebel held valley north-west of Damascus. All the SAA forces there will end up reinforcing the east Ghouta push which is already going quite well without them anyway.
In any case it's no badge of competence for the government to be able to defeat the rebels in a high intensity battle where it commits its best forces while it loses ground elsewhere, it means they cannot project strenght consistently over the main battlegrounds, but only selectively to the most high priority objective at a given time.
Hama is far from endangered, but it's good to remember how easily Idlib fell. Yeah, it was almost surrounded, but so is Daraa, yet due to heavy fortifications and a layered defense it still stands in governemnt hands. I doubt Hama has a layered city defense, most of its defense would be checkpoints and possibly berms in the countryside. Not that I think Hama will fall, 90% not, but there's still that 10%, and we all know how unpredictable this war is.
Typhoon wrote:The main fighting elements in the conflict against IS are the Iranian/Iraqi/Syrian governments and associated militia.
The SDF has by far had the most negative impact on IS in Syria up to now, it's not really even comparable with the government which has only captured Tadmur, Qaryatayn and surrounding villages, pus more vollages around Kuweires airbase. The SDF on the other hand not only captured much more land, but screwed up IS supply lines to Turkey and Iraq in the process, and is effectively the most responsible for ISIL's attrition in Syria. In the future however, the SAA and allied militias will be doing most of the rest of the clearing.
Diversity within Oneness.