Chinlone: earliest form of soccer? - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Polls on politics, news, current affairs and history.

Can chinlone be considered the earliest form of soccer?

yes
2
29%
no
3
43%
kind of
1
14%
not really
1
14%
other
No votes
0%
#14679113
Chinlone is an ancient Burmese non-competitive activity, very similar to modern soccer (although unrelated) in that it exclusively involves the skillful art of foot play (also comparable to the more developed Chinese game of cuju and other neighboring varieties).
#14679163
I don't think kick round object around took a brain trust to invent. I am guessing the cavemen did it too.
#14679209
I don't think kick round object around took a brain trust to invent. I am guessing the cavemen did it too.


Exactly, it's much like trying to figure out when weightlifting or sprinting became sports.
#14679866
Prosthetic Conscience wrote:Since Wikipedia says cuju is older, and cuju is a competitive sport that even had goals and teams, then no.

Chinlone is at least 1,500 years old ; and judging from its originality one can estimate it to be much older than cuju, especially if one takes into account the earliest possible forms before caneballs were invented.
#14680037
geb wrote:Since Wikipedia says cuju is older, and cuju is a competitive sport that even had goals and teams, then no.
Chinlone is at least 1,500 years old ; and judging from its originality one can estimate it to be much older than cuju, especially if one takes into account the earliest possible forms before caneballs were invented.

And cuju was "first mentioned as an exercise in a military work from 3rd–2nd century BC". So it's about 7 centuries older. Just saying "well, it could be older, thought we have no evidence at all that it is" is meaningless. "Judging from its originality one can estimate it to be much older" is meaningless too.
#14680108
Zionist Nationalist wrote:What is soccer?

its football. you can call the American thing soccer since there you dont kick the ball 99% of the time

American football isn't a form of soccer ; in that case footvolley could also be one.


Prosthetic Conscience wrote:And cuju was "first mentioned as an exercise in a military work from 3rd–2nd century BC". So it's about 7 centuries older. Just saying "well, it could be older, thought we have no evidence at all that it is" is meaningless. "Judging from its originality one can estimate it to be much older" is meaningless too.

Chinlone being older than cuju doesn't imperatively require tangible proof of its existence before the 3rd century BC, given attestations of this sort of activity are very unlikely prior to then; so to judge it as meaningless is simply narrow-minded and arrogant.
#14680194
Image

Episkyros in ancient Greece could be the oldest form of football, which was practised in ancient Greece by 2000 BC. The ball was made out of pig bladder and it was tightly wrapped with leather. A competitive form of cuju in China, which was used as fitness training for military cavaliers, may be an imitation of Harpastum, a ball game played in the Roman Empire for the same purpose.

Around 2000 BC, the Greeks played a game called episkyros. The game was played primarily by men and sometimes women. Regardless of their gender, the Greeks usually played nude.
A marble relief from the National Museum of Archeology in Athens shows an athlete balancing the ball on his thigh, supposedly teaching the technique to a boy. This very same image is nowadays featured on the European Cup trophy. The ball seen in the relief is clearly a “follis” or an inflated ball. Early balls were made of linen and hair wrapped in string and sewn together. These probably would not have bounced very well. Later Greek balls like the follis were made from inflated pig bladders wrapped in tight leather.
http://expertfootball.com/wp/?p=719
#14680330
ThirdTerm wrote:Episkyros in ancient Greece could be the oldest form of football, which was practised in ancient Greece by 2000 BC. The ball was made out of pig bladder and it was tightly wrapped with leather. A competitive form of cuju in China, which was used as fitness training for military cavaliers, may be an imitation of Harpastum, a ball game played in the Roman Empire for the same purpose.

Neither episkyros nor harpastum revolve around foot play though... handling is a much more important aspect to both.
#14680582
Before we get carried away, the '2000 BC' date looks made up. The marble relief dates from around 400 BC. Since Linear B only dates back to 1450 BC or so, and that's the earliest Greek writing that has been deciphered, saying there was a game with a specific name in 2000 BC just looks like an invention. Perhaps they meant 200 BC?
geb wrote:Chinlone being older than cuju doesn't imperatively require tangible proof of its existence before the 3rd century BC, given attestations of this sort of activity are very unlikely prior to then; so to judge it as meaningless is simply narrow-minded and arrogant.

And cuju could be centuries older too. There could have been football-like games all over the place. But if you want to name the oldest, you need some evidence, not just someone saying "they could have been playing it, but we just have no idea".
#14680590
Prosthetic Conscience wrote:And cuju could be centuries older too. There could have been football-like games all over the place. But if you want to name the oldest, you need some evidence, not just someone saying "they could have been playing it, but we just have no idea".

If the first records of Chinlone appeared 1,500 years ago, then the game is presumably much older, by centuries if not millennia... The fact that we have no other comparable records outside SE Asia suggests that Burma is more than likely to be the birthplace of the oldest form of « football » in the world i.e.: exclusive foot play.

If another substantial form of football had appeared earlier elsewhere, it would have presumably persevered into Antiquity and modern times... but we have no records of it.
#14680685
geb wrote:If the first records of Chinlone appeared 1,500 years ago, then the game is presumably much older, by centuries if not millennia... The fact that we have no other comparable records outside SE Asia suggests that Burma is more than likely to be the birthplace of the oldest form of « football » in the world i.e.: exclusive foot play.

If another substantial form of football had appeared earlier elsewhere, it would have presumably persevered into Antiquity and modern times... but we have no records of it.

But we do have older records - cuju, in China, about 700 years older. That suggests it is older than chinlone.
#14680687
Somebody wake me up when they hold a World Cup for chinlone or cujo. *zzzzzzz....*
#14680752
Rancid wrote:I thought the game was played with the severed heads of slaves?

Isn't that for the meso-american version?


Prosthetic Conscience wrote:But we do have older records - cuju, in China, about 700 years older. That suggests it is older than chinlone.

For cuju, as an official game it is much more likely that the first records appeared as soon as the game was invented; which is why I believe that Chinlone, although attested later is much more likely to have been conceived before its first recordings and therefore older than cuju...
Left vs right, masculine vs feminine

Glad you are so empathetic and self-critical and […]

The more time passes, the more instances of haras[…]

It turns out it was all a complete lie with no bas[…]

I am not claiming that there are zero genetic dif[…]