Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo North America Mods
Rich wrote:Neither candidate wants to win at all costs.
Igor Antunov wrote:He will say 'do this' and Pence will go do it.
Trump is a manager, the oval OFFICE would suit him.
Alec must be desperate pay his bills!", my opinion hasn't changed.
Drlee wrote:Trump is a performer. He is a brand. He is definitely NOT a manager.
He's chairman and president of his own Trump Organization, with five executive vice presidents, three of which are his children. I wonder how many times he appears in his office in Trump Tower, once a month I'd guess. I'm sure he would have the same routine as POTUS as well.
If he wins, Trump is likely to turn the office of POTUS into a more monarchical, symbolic role and less of an executive role. In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch's main usefulness is in the mere fact that he or she exists. The monarch is the 'master signifier' of the constitutional system, the lynchpin of the system. The monarch does not have to be particularly brilliant or proactive - in fact, it's probably better if they are not particularly brilliant or proactive. Their job is simply to exist. Trump seems to play a similar role in the Trump Organisation - his intellectual vacuity and laziness are not handicaps - after all, he can pay other people to be brilliant for him and to work hard for him. This is what 'ownership' of capital means. All Trump has to do is to stand there and be all awesome 'n' shit.
Beren wrote:What closeted supporters Donald?
ArtAllm wrote:Goldman Sachs and other (((entities))), that prop up the decrepit and crooked Hillary, openly threatened to kick out their employees, if they support Trump.
There was an unprecedented hate and demonization campaign in the "lame stream" (((American))) media against Trump.
So it is obvious that in this soviet-style environment of hate not many people are willing to openly say that they are supporting Trump.
If they receive a call, they seldom say the truth, because they are afraid that they are exposed and will be persecuted by the Establishment.
But in an secret vote they can do what they really want, without being afraid of any persecution.
If you asked the people in the former DDR a couple of weeks before the collapse of this Commie state "Do you support Erich Honecker in his fight against the wicked Capitalists?", 99% of the persons would have said: "Yes, of course, we love our party and our leader, and hate Capitalists". In a couple of weeks Erich Honecker had to hide from the anger of the people, and there was a mass exodus from East Germany into the Capitalist West Germany.
The same with the Romanian leader, if you asked the Romanian people if they love their Party and the leader Nicolae Ceaușescu two weeks before he was killed by the rebels, 99% would have said "yes".
Can you get my drift?
So it is obvious that in this soviet-style environment of hate not many people are willing to openly say that they are supporting Trump.
If they receive a call, they seldom say the truth, because they are afraid that they are exposed and will be persecuted by the Establishment.
But in an secret vote they can do what they really want, without being afraid of any persecution.
Only half of Republicans would accept Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, as their president, according to a new poll. And if she wins, nearly 70% said it would be because of illegal voting or vote rigging, according to a Reuters/Ipsos survey released on Friday.
ArtAllm wrote:Goldman Sachs and other (((entities))), that prop up the decrepit and crooked Hillary, openly threatened to kick out their employees, if they support Trump.
There was an unprecedented hate and demonization campaign in the "lame stream" (((American))) media against Trump.
So it is obvious that in this soviet-style environment of hate not many people are willing to openly say that they are supporting Trump.
Pants-of-dog wrote:Not really, no.
Project Veritas is the only source for these allegations, and they have never made a claim that was actually substantiated with evidence. In fact, they have had to pay lawsuits because of their lies.
But they have no problem with lying. They make more money from donors than they pay in fines, and they get this money from donors because they malign the enemies of the donors.
They are basically selling a service of disinformation to willing conservative buyers.
Not that this is a thing that only conservatives do. The Democrats may well have sent agitators. But we should really wait for a more objective source to substantiate the claims before believing them.
TIG linked to a good article about it: viewtopic.php?f=26&t=166598&p=14728021#p14728021
SpecialOlympian wrote:Lol Trump is going to lose bigly and the Trump name will forever be associated with racism, failure, and incompetence.
Isn't oil and electricity bought and sold like ev[…]