- 27 Jul 2017 21:44
#14827601
HiFo baby I didn't know how else to contact you you weren't getting my pms apparently. I know it's way OT I can split this thread up as required.
In terms of what Beren and Ned Lud was saying they obviously need to interpret Britain in its medieval context, that is, as an Imperial cross-roads. By 1030ad Britain was only significant in so far as it was part of the Danish Imperial calculus, followed immediately by being part of the norman (also norsemen) calculus. Then the angevin empire. This concept of linear decent of Anglo-Saxon monarchy did not really exist
In terms of what Beren and Ned Lud was saying they obviously need to interpret Britain in its medieval context, that is, as an Imperial cross-roads. By 1030ad Britain was only significant in so far as it was part of the Danish Imperial calculus, followed immediately by being part of the norman (also norsemen) calculus. Then the angevin empire. This concept of linear decent of Anglo-Saxon monarchy did not really exist
The concepts "WAR" and "PROGRESS" are now obsolete.