Maybe someone more knowledgable could explain the practical implications of this apparent development to me instead of all the metaphoric Trump effigy burning
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo Today's News Mods
>"Sunni Shia World War"
>"Islamic lobby" "Islam control EU"
That's the most stupidest thing I have ever heard.
The PAEAC comprised two hundred West European parliamentarians then representing the major trends of the political spectrum. Thus, the program of a Euro-Arab entente was approved by a broad consensus, covering the entire European political scene.
This policy was not limited to supporting the pro-Arab political movement officially initiated by President Charles de Gaulle after the June 1967 Six Day War. Its scope extended to a new policy which de Gaulle would most certainly have disapproved, as it innovated a strategy opening Europe’s doors to the aims of the OIC and sketched the outlines of Eurabia.Members of PAEAC belonged to the national parliaments of European Community member states and also countries outside the EC.
As early as the 1970s its members had revived this platform within the new structure, PAEAC, with responsibility for standardizing the policies of the EC and the Arab League across various fields and in foreign policies, particularly against Israel.
Through the “Dialogue,” Arab League politicians and economists have gained a firm ascendancy over Europe’s policy and economy. There is no similar example of a foreign lobby infiltrating the parliamentary system of other countries as has the PAEAC, the Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation, which has managed to impose Arab League policy toward Israel and America upon Europe, with European leaders’ full approval. This overwhelming Arab ascendancy, unparalleled anywhere in the world, is nevertheless brushed aside by Arab leaders—who never cease complaining about alleged EU sympathies for Israel.
Regarding Europe, the association called for news coverage more favorable to Arab causes, as well as special conditions for Arab immigrants:
Over the years, the legal instruments created by the many treaties binding the EC/EU member states established a juridical and political institutional structure that weighed heavily on Europeans. “Eurocrat” decisions micromanaged the economies and markets of EU states. The EU nations’ media and educational systems have been indoctrinating and conditioning Europeans to accept the new sociopolitical directives. The Euro-Arab Dialogue and its Arab lobby, the Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation (PAEAC), were already interwoven within the European parliaments. They were also represented in the European Parliament and in the EC structures pre-dating the European Union. The combination of a powerful Eurabian lobby with compliant European political, media, and educational systems produced throughout the EU that uniform political thinking known as “political correctness,” so implacably opposed to any divergent opinion. Dissenters were harshly censured in universities, books and the media.
ness31 wrote:If you’re a ‘friend of Israel’ and you recognise it as an officially legal state, then why would recognition of Jerusalem as its capital be so controversial?
Do you think the turn of policy after 1973 oil embargo and Palestine media obsession came out of the blue?
Of course today there is free will in EU support for the Palestine cause (which lies on historical European ancient hatred)
but historically speaking it was a policy adopted as a result of the Arab Lobby in EU with the Arab states.
EU Arab lobby, PAEAC (the Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation) and the native Arab lobby in Britain, CAABU (The Council for Arab-British Understanding) and LMEC (Labour Middle East Council) both founded by British Labor MP Christopher Mayhew.
Ter wrote:Of course you do. The chip on your shoulder about your skin colour is of Olympic proportions, there is no denying that.
Ter wrote:The democrats want to open up a path to citizenship for the illegals.
Ter wrote: but Trump promised to deport them and he seems to be keeping his election promise.
Bulaba Jones wrote:It sounded a lot like apologetics for war crimes, ethnic cleansing, ethnic superiority, concentration camps (including Gaza, the biggest open-air one), rape and murder, aggression against neighbors, colonization (still alive and well in this era), and territorial annexation (including Golan). Other than that, not sure about that either, @skinster.
The Gaza Strip, wrote Martha Gellhorn, "is not a hell-hole, not a visible disaster. It is worse. It is a jail." (Atlantic Monthly, October 1961).
The View From The Ground by Martha Gellhorn - 2015
Then I remarked that Gaza town was a beehive of activity, with all the UNEF soldiers, Danes, Norwegians, Indians, Canadians, ... It is worse; it is a jail—with a magical long white sand beach, and a breeze, and devoted welfare workers (UNRWA) to look after the prisoners.
On Thursday, the White House said the vice-president planned to hold the meeting as planned.
Mr Pence "still intends to meet Mr Abbas and Palestinian leaders and thinks any decision to pull out of the meeting would be counterproductive," a White House official said.
Relative to what? Morality is subjective - unless […]
Two comments: 1. Poor is a relative term. 2. It[…]
I really hope those yellow vest movement will grow[…]