colliric wrote:The specific MeToo celebrity I mentioned(first one swept up in the Weinstein debacle):
Obviously there are other examples too. The movement wasn't born out of a vacuum.
This does not support the claim that the MeToo movement is a codefied group of highly agressive feminists.
Nor does it support the claim that the most of the members were in other smaller activist feminist groups.
Nor does it support the claim that these other smaller activist feminist groups are or were anti-male.
The only claim it supports is that Ashley Judd was attending protests.
Self-identification. Just posting on the topic isn't enough. Specifically saying "I'm with MeToo" or words to that effect and/or formally attending protests. This is similar to how most social movements(like Hacktivist groups, etc) and even most terrorist groups, define membership.
Who has done this? Please provide evidence for any claims.
No... Only a few powerful bad eggs delibrately abusing the current climate to push their agenda legally. And their influence is mostly felt in Family Court proceedings.
What do you mean by anti-male legal atmosphere?
Who are these supposed bad eggs? How does MeToo have anything to do with family court?
Most family court discussions end up being about how MRAs want split custody despite the fact that the divorcing father was not a very active parent before the divorce. Due to the fact that this is an MRA talking point and has nothing to do with sexual assault and sexual harassment, the burden of proof is on you to show how this conspiracy works.