- 20 Feb 2018 19:55
#14890515
So many errors.... Yet oddly, you cannot refute a single sentence I have written.
They don't, and it isn't. I occasionally get fan mail from people who have understood why I am right. In some cases, they even confess that the dishonesty of their "arguments" was exactly as I described, and everything became obvious once they found a willingness to know self-evident and indisputable facts of objective physical reality.
Of course. But all human progress has come from those who did not renounce the truth even when everyone around them told them they were wrong. Galileo, Jenner, Semmelweiss, the list goes on and on.
What kind of person could ask if the truth about good and evil in modern civilization matters?
Right back atcha, champ.
Claims advanced without evidence -- i.e., almost everything Marx wrote -- can be dismissed without evidence. And you are aware that I almost always DO supply evidence for my statements.
But more likely, you refuse to know things that you know to be true because you know that they prove your beliefs are false.
B0ycey wrote:So many errors TtP, is it even worth acknowledging your presents?
So many errors.... Yet oddly, you cannot refute a single sentence I have written.
When everyone tells you that you are wrong and only you claim to be correct
They don't, and it isn't. I occasionally get fan mail from people who have understood why I am right. In some cases, they even confess that the dishonesty of their "arguments" was exactly as I described, and everything became obvious once they found a willingness to know self-evident and indisputable facts of objective physical reality.
could you really be wrong?
Of course. But all human progress has come from those who did not renounce the truth even when everyone around them told them they were wrong. Galileo, Jenner, Semmelweiss, the list goes on and on.
But does it really matter?
What kind of person could ask if the truth about good and evil in modern civilization matters?
Ignorance is bliss. Believe what you like.
Right back atcha, champ.
It doesn't affect me or reality and I instead will discuss these matters with people who don't cry or shout 'false' to a claim without supplying any evidence when debating economics.
Claims advanced without evidence -- i.e., almost everything Marx wrote -- can be dismissed without evidence. And you are aware that I almost always DO supply evidence for my statements.
Perhaps I know things to be true.
But more likely, you refuse to know things that you know to be true because you know that they prove your beliefs are false.