- 17 Jul 2018 07:51
#14933347
@Hong Wu
You have done absolutely nothing even address my point. This post isn't about what you said, but everything about your ideology in general. Your thought is overall severely underdeveloped due to your utter unwillingness to properly address the topics you discuss. Furthermore, you are only confirming my belief that your thought is all talk and no substance. You use terms such as "historical revisionism" liberally with no regard as to what historical revisionism is nor giving the people reading this thread even a glimpse as to what you mean by it in this context. It seems to me you call anything you don't like historical revisionism, a habit surely adopted from the various conservative sources you frequent.
Also, while I agree that the analogy I presented to depict your intentional blindness towards the topics you discuss, this does not delegitimize my argument. It's merely nitpicking at best given that, whether the analogy is present or not, it only compliments my point; my argument doesn't hinge on this analogy.
No one is saying the riots are good. In fact, the only people who happen to have a remotely positive reaction to this riot and the property damage that went along with it are two conservatives, Albert and noir who are happy for these riots because it validates their beliefs somehow. Even you are somewhat fine with it, reacting to news of the riot in a "I told you so" kind of manner.
Quick note, not everyone knows what you mean and you can't rely on the fact that everyone knows what you mean either.