Victoribus Spolia wrote:This is basically a concession you were wrong when I said the article supported the claim of higher bio-diversity during warmer higher c02 climates and you said it didn't. This is why no one takes you seriously BTW.
I was actually discussing your repeated claim that global warming would lead to more biodiversity.
Yes, the article mentions that there was more biodiversity in thenoast and that this happened at a time when the planet was hotter. But it also clearly points out that this biodiversity is due to limited human impact on the environment, and not caused by increased temperatures.
So, while the article supports the claim of higher bio-diversity during warmer higher c02 climates, it does not support the claim that higher CO2 levels will kead to more biodiversity. Correlation is not causation.
Also, What proof do you have that given the same climatic conditions repeating that bio-diversity will not increase?
I have already presented evidence in the form of an article from Scientific American.
Also, the article in the OP implies that this increased biodiversity was due to the lack of human impact. Since there is now highly significant amounts of human impact, the logical implication is that biodiversity will continue to decrease.
The study mentioned in the article corroborates this.
This a wildly a-historical presumption given how nature has reacted to climate changes in the past which were often just as rapid as the one we are allegedly experiencing right now.
Please present evidence that climate changes in the past occurred at the same rate as the current one.
As far as I know, the current rate of climate change is far fadter than most examples.
If that were the case then their claims would take into account actual hot-house climates that have actually occurred in the past. They do not.
How do you know they do not?
Global warming and rising sea level models have been wrong in the past BTW. the scientific research that contributed to Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" resulted in multiple inaccurate and failed predictions.
So paint me a skeptic on model accuracy. Same thing can be said about overpopulation and food-shortage models as well BTW.
How exactly have the models led to multiple inaccurate and failed predictions?