- 15 Aug 2018 13:34
#14939846
Easy there killer. I didn't say that homosexuals were more likely to molest kids, if so maybe I would hesistate letting my homosexual brother from hanging with my kids, but I don't because I already know those statistics.
That is not what I was inquiring about, I was asking whether or not being a kid in the Roman church increases your chances of being molested because of the per capita percentage of molesters among the clergy. That is all.
I only mentioned homosexuality in passing with incels and others as the sorts attracted to clerical celibacy....and no doubt some heterosexuals and asexuals and whatever do as well, my point was that people are often attracted to a job that requires celibacy in order to hide something they view as negative, like being gay in catholic family, or not being able to get laid/married etc.
That is all.
Don't get all triggered over something I didn't even argue.
If you want to argue stats, try providing some for your claim that molestation in the catholic church is incidental and not indicative.
Then we will have a conversation.
"It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals... is incompatible with freedom."
- Patrick Henry
Zagadka wrote:It is kinda funny that you are mixing some of the most conservative populations with the most "liberal" (homosexuality itself has no ties to social thought other than being homosexual)
By your logic, putting girls into male heterosexual couples would be supremely safe.
Oh, you want stats.
For the record, the Kinsey institute has already absolutely destroyed the "projection" stats that you are encompassing. This following article will outline your thought assumptions. It is long so I won't quote it in full. I'm not fully invested in the text, it is just what showed up on a quick search (as I say below, the Kinsey studies aren't available ATM)
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/h ... ation.html
Unfortunately, the Kinsey site is having technical errors, so I can't link to direct studies from it.
Easy there killer. I didn't say that homosexuals were more likely to molest kids, if so maybe I would hesistate letting my homosexual brother from hanging with my kids, but I don't because I already know those statistics.
That is not what I was inquiring about, I was asking whether or not being a kid in the Roman church increases your chances of being molested because of the per capita percentage of molesters among the clergy. That is all.
I only mentioned homosexuality in passing with incels and others as the sorts attracted to clerical celibacy....and no doubt some heterosexuals and asexuals and whatever do as well, my point was that people are often attracted to a job that requires celibacy in order to hide something they view as negative, like being gay in catholic family, or not being able to get laid/married etc.
That is all.
Don't get all triggered over something I didn't even argue.
If you want to argue stats, try providing some for your claim that molestation in the catholic church is incidental and not indicative.
Then we will have a conversation.
"It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals... is incompatible with freedom."
- Patrick Henry